Search results

"Exchanges don't generally offer native spreads on index futures, not even in the calendars AFAIK." so does that mean legging risk? don't think so have not heard anybody talking about it ( only legging risk that is discussed online is Autospreader doing synthetic spreads. arb spreads )

Sorry not sure I understand, what is 10S? and how are you left with 86 cents after buying 10s ?

What is sequence risk?

Hello Options experts I have been looking at the ETF which is Capital protected at expiry and has a cap to upside all base don SPY ETF Symbl = CPSM https://www.calamos.com/funds/etf/ My question is is this doable at retail? Here is the info So basically it is a Option combo of 1) Long Deep...

Ok here is what I found more: SO basically it is a Option combo of 1) Long Deep ITM call 2) Long ATM Put 3) Short OTM call thus at expiry if SPY goes up max you can earn is that CAP and At expiry max downside is zero - Options are FLEX options, sounds OTC but counter party is OCC so high...

Why does this need a autospreader? are these pair spreads not have own book with no legging risk

I did some calculation on it's sister fund CRF ( base don SPY) 1) Bought at inception in 1987 $121, current value June 24 = $7.8 total loss = -113.2 dividend received = $307 So total profit over 36 year s= 8.52% PA , 2) Bought worst case $ 156 in Dec 2006 current value June 24 = $7.8 total loss...

Does IB ( AUS) allow DRIP AT NAV - CLM ETF

hi Anybody using DRIP AT NAV - ETF LIKE CLM What are the risks , some talk about RO setting etc Not sure I understand Any experiences

Hi looking at Capital protected98-100% ( with upside cap8-10% ) ETFs from Calmos or Innovator https://www.calamos.com/funds/etf/calamos-sp-500-structured-alt-protection-etf-may-cpsm/#_portfolio Any thoughts experiences?

ok even worst then more suckers

I take your point .. there is a thin line Hope regulators look in to it more deeply, The test fee can be construed as "First loss/ skin in the game type payment and hence same as True prop! ( unless you are employed at true prop as a salaried employee and does not have to do any capital contribution

Yes but what I am saying is ( to compare apples to apples) Once you are funded with these New prop firms is it not same as Bright and hence same regulations should apply .!

Even when they fund you with a live account, you are trading with someone else's money under a contractual relationship Ok but then how come legit Prop forms have broker dealer license like Bright Trading !

Test fees are normally under $300 so people don't bother ,,, and this is exactly what these business models prey on 10,0000 x $200 collected few thousands funded or one day just make a runner... why the regulators are not acting,, the problem is under the disguise of "Freedom of everything"...

A collapse of crypto is unfortunately going to affect other financial markets even though many in the REAL financial market have nothing to do with this " fluff"

how exactly does it work as compared to STOCK ETF? Buying ETF on exchange does not create new units, just changes hand , Creating new units and increasing AUM means ETF after getting the new money commitment has to go and purchase new Bitcoins, correct

Some of the Edge select criteria is vague not clear mathematically so that means they can manipulate funding , Correct me if I am wrong

: The accounts utilized for our services are demo accounts. WTF Further Axi’s hedge counterparties at the time of publication are: AXICORP PTE. LTD. Clients are indirectly exposed to counterparty risks notwithstanding these protections and should review the disclosures in the risk warning...

By now it is pretty clear that these business models are either complete fraud or just set to collect test fees .. the wild wild west of unregulated products