Search results

Thats one of the solutions, another is quality food instead of huge quantity for each meal. The ultimate goal of eating is to make you stronger, not to feel full. I'm done for the day for my posts. Should we be disciplined in posting the same way as in trading? :D

Right. Otherwise, the crime rate will increase significantly.

This is Buddha concept. To view thing from the white angle instead of from black angle. There is infinite positive stuffs as well as infinite negative stuffs in the Universe, then is one used to think negatively one will live in the negative forever since the loop of the negative never end...

1. He was famous for what he made, not because of dying broke. Even if dying with lots of money but can't bring it with, so what. 2. If success as primary factor, yes we're comparing apples to apples, different trading style doesn't matter. 3. Despite having doubts. Very interesting anyway.

Of course, we believe him to some degree and we strongly wish he succeeds. And then this astonishing success will tell a lot about the Market.

The top three: 1. Jesse Livermore 2. Warren Buffett 3. Maybe this guy? :D

The hell is found here.

The problem with the losing concept (position, trade) is that you always find right argument to support your case or your holding. But the truth is another story. Wall Street is the place to make money, not to argue. If BSC is not enough, I guess for you, until GS, JPM, GE file for chapter 11...

You're completely right Susana! Nobody is making money in ET. They all or most of them are making money in NYSE and NASD. :D Here is another post that support your 99% crap theory.

He is strongly disciplined guy. Winning is almost assured but not big. He not only knew how GE behaves, he feels it too.

Of course, there is no such system which winning is assured. This is the way to know the trader's innermost thoughts. It tells about whether he has a good habit or not for lost controlling instead of letting his ego (=loses) runs.

Let assume we have two winning systems which both of them made the same total amount of profits at the end and executed approximately the same number of trades. The first system has 80% winning rate while the second has only 40% winning rate. Which system you prefer? The first system is not...

Another reason to prove that the Market is not efficient. It's easily influenced by external sources. :D

You are disciplined enough to be a good trader. However, your discipline is placed on the wrong side, meaning that you should be disciplined to limit loses instead of being disciplined to limit gains. The old adage say "Cut loses short and let profits run". If it's being said often and by many...

Firstly, I wish great success to all those lucky guys. Secondly, this act is just proving your generous heart, it doesn't have a counter-argument to another thread because... 1. The fact you didn't charge them, show that you really have a good skill to trade stocks, meaning that you make a...

Congratulation! Now you have an unhurt and diplomatic way to say NO. :D

The reason why he is willing to do that is to make ET stands as its name. This way is to gradually clean up the 'parasites' and therefore make them become Elite Trader, one day who know. :D Any way, this is very generous act. Not only the lucky three members will get the benefit, we all...

Certainly no. If the stocks he gives were profitable then he won't be guru, he will trade for himself and shut up. Don't you think taking money from you is easier than from the market in this context? I think taking money from you is harder than from the market. So if the stocks he gave were...

Now, ask yourself what will you do if SPY went to $130.80 instead of $131.30? Will you hit the exit button or hold on?

Firstly, there is no way to measure correctly how the person is intelligent; while the IQ test is very controversial. Secondly, when the person X self-proclaimed that he is intelligent than others then there is a sign that he is probably the dumb one.