Search results

"We must not only defend our 2nd amendment but enhance it, to make it the legal duty of ALL American patriots to carry guns. Only if we are ALL armed, can further massacres be stopped." Enlighten me on how the above doesn't mean every citizen in America.

Okay let's play. I completely agree on the automobile safer and responsible part. Do we not use newer technology to improve outcomes of a crash. Do car makers not attempt to get good safety ratings. Do we not have automobile laws or seat belts for safety and other regulations to protect...

1) No it's not. A back test does not show any ACTUAL proof that it can be done by someone, only that it's a possibility. The back test does not account for different future market conditions and therefore your results can be misleading. Markets are much different now than they were 47 years ago...

Buddy we lost the civil discussion part since the first post OP started. The problem is thinking allowing anyone and everyone to own guns will solve all problems when it will obviously just cause more bloodshed, violence, and murders crimes.

1) it's backtested 2) the poster didn't even provide the backtest. All he did was make a post.

What would you rather us say? Wow! This dude is posting texts and numbers on a thread! He totally showed us how you could make 300% in 47 years!! Dude, that's not the least bit impressive. Pretty pathetic actually especially when it's not even hard evidence.

Ask him why he bought back copies of his documentary and why he doesn't want the world to see it.

Fuck off dumb ass

Really dude that's all you have to say? Haha. There are forces and catalysts that's affect supply and demand and there are much more than TA and much stronger forces than TA. I don't know what point you're trying to make with that broad statement.

Lol and then go back to our old barbaric and lawless ways of society where we either kill or be killed. Dude we're trying to move the world forward not backwards.

There's your problem, stop focusing on what threads on forums say and actually read the good books. Forums nowadays suck and are filled with crap from 95% losing traders. Years ago, the content was much better and structured around actual market mechanics, order flow, liquidity reactions to key...

There, now when you put it like that I can agree with you. But to come out and say TA is completely useless and crap and you shouldn't not consider it at all is a dumb and ill founded statement. Truth of the matter is TA concepts do create order flow and provide a road map to take advantage...

I agree. Any country can say we've taken in x amount of refugees, but the fact that they fail to provide any evidence raises red flags. It's sad and selfish on their part when such a rich Islamic country fails to follow their own religion and care for the people who (most of) follow the same...

Bullshit my ass. Read it and weep buddy boy. http://time.com/4025187/arab-states-syrian-refugees/ "Supporters of Gulf governments contend that such criticism is unwarranted. The Gulf states have donated tens of millions of dollars to help Syrian refugees in places like Jordan. Saudi Arabia...

We're really still doing this? The ones attacking TA are fundamentalists or quants who are a bunch of naysayers because they obviously suck at TA. TA and price action does present an edge especially when combined with other phenomena. Point being just because they suck at using it to make...

Saudi Arabia is one country that has said refugees are welcome. The criticism is that they haven't been making that obvious enough.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugees_of_the_Syrian_Civil_War It would pay to actually research before starting a thread

I can see how this could be useful

No Looks like a dumb strategy that gets you in late due to following signals from lagging indicators.

Seriously? And they couldn't set up beds in the gym or whatever their other option was why?