Search results

Eh, you wrote "that" two weeks ago. It is true there's a bias to revert TOWARD (but not necessarily through) the nearest strike but I pointed out A. $30 is potent B. It's failed above $30 numeous times. Insider buying is nil. Summer has a seasonal tendency. It's already rallied from...

I checked it out. It's on the pink sheets. Which.........eh......is "worse" than bulleting boards. 250%? On a quarter? What's the spread? You excite easily, don't cha?

Pssst, Continental Illinois.

Here's CTGX. When the "X" suffix is eventually dropped from it's ticker, it's going to have an orgasm. Insiders own a chunk, Oh that's right, you don't have that "long" of an attention span. Sorry.

NHYDY had its move. 2004 to 2008

You knew what I meant. Anal retentive. The real point is the 1967 peg. No PC's no cell phones, textiles sitll made in the US (not at Asian labor rates). Host of other lifestyle (and hence purchases) differences with today. It's still a flawed measure and lags the PPI. Wholesales...

CPI is flawed. Basket of goods pegged to 1967. Excludes food and energy. Basics. Try the PPI Rising commodity prices are either reflected in higher end user prices OR reduced profit margins. There can be inflation/disinflation/deflation simultaneously depending on sector...

I don't consider 141 DJIA points as big time and TRIN is at .49. ADI's 20 day ATR is $1.05. Relative to the prevailing $28.40, that's 3.69%. In essence, it hasn't moved a day's range. Round numbers are potent. Hasn't been to $33 since 2008. Obviously to get to $33, it has to pierce...

What? Didn't like the chart? Let's take a pan-o-ramic view.

Two failed breakouts above 30 and it's already moved there from 17ish. Price to sales ratio is 3.8x Institutions own 87%. Saturated. Stellar results? Up 2.8% today.

You can generally massasge numbers (and statistics) to support (or refute) conclusions. Acutarians and accountants do it all the time. Does this thread DISTURB you? LOL Do you have a compulsion to research, cut & snip on a thread you give no credence to? Blantantly simple remedy (as...

Cute how you take selected excerpts to slant. Stefan honey, I didn't say I subscribed to such. Merely repsonded to someone else who started a thread. Lunacy? Ask any sailor about lunar tides. Luna sea. Statistics, more than a random sampling, indicate both crime and auto accidents...

For those who subscribe to such, there's a more potent issue referred to as the Cardinal Climax. Last occured 1927-1935. Hmmm. Search Arch Crawford, then consider his track record in Hulbert. I prefer numbers (not to be confused with numerology) but I'd give more credence to Crawford...

Nope, never been to The Gap, or Old Navy But I am having a kick ass day today. Best of both worlds. Net short (but long gold mining shares). There's an old adage that "they don't ring a bell at the top". I personally consider Monday's massive gap up a GONG. But hey, that's just me...

This a trading site. So why are you focusing (or dwelling) on yields? The EY, reciprocal of a PE hinges on those two variables. The P is quite dynamic. The E is only dynamic four times a year. Generally compared with risk-free Treasuries. Are Treasuries risk-free? Is the short end...

It wasn't a rebound it was gap. A very large gap. Immediately after a two day downdfraft. Two days. Three days. Neither makes a trend. A gap is a synthentic price point. Clearly has a human element involved. A gap in one stock is an isolated event A gap in an index, or two index...

That first line of yours is rich. Too bad you're not. But with 2400 posts, "obviously" YOU understand how markets funk shun. The answer to your question about Monday morning is : VENUE. Inter-continent arbitrage is only in your dreams, particularly regarding 1270 shares at what, 12 ish.

Silly and illogical??? Number one, I have no position. Just an outside observer. Number two. What's silly is some clown thinking he's acquired something for 20 cents apiece, and, like thief, is going to flip it for the prevailing price and run to the bank with NO repurcussions. Number...

Yep, in a perfect world it would be both equitable and logical to bust both sides. But it's not a perfect world. Once again, a fill at 20 cents should have come has no surprise to the OP. Robbed? Who's trying to be the robber? Call it a price for greed, or, as another poster...

It should come as NO surprise a fill at a ridicuous price was busted. You have no complaint hence a suit would be pointless.