Search results

RTL / LTL

Too cool. Thanks for sharing your progress. I would be interested to hear/see a rough plan of the shells. I will throw something together that fits my ideas of the 3 'layers/shells' of monitoring/analysis. I will try to keep up with you guys on the M&A portion, however my programming will...

You have completely missed the point of this thread. This is completely different than an edger mentality, playing the percentages and tweaking indicators to have profitable backtests. These smart folks are working on a system that stays on the right side of the market and reverses when...

Hi ehorn.. If you get the time, could you talk about some of the actions from your chart? I think you mentioned end of bar actions is all the system can muster at this point. I am a bit puzzled at some of the entries/reversals. For instance, the reversal to short on Bar 17 and 73 ...

Crude or not, excellent results... Congrats man

Ahh too many feelings get hurt too quickly around here. I dont have anyone on the ignore list, no need to really. I simply respond to responses to my posts, which will be few and far between. I hope you guys get it figured out, best of luck...

Great post. Your direct, to the point comments are shadowed only by your arrogant smugness. Congrats Not that I disagree with most of your post, it is fairly accurate. But patting yourself on the back for having a resistance line from yesterday on your chart? Werent you the one practicing...

Sorry, I have no idea what you are talking about. We are discussing the 15:20 bar I dont know why you are placing emphasis on 10 min chart, gaussian peak heights, etc... We have dumbed this down to just 5 min ES for a reason, to simplify and understand sequencing, which obviously hasnt...

Nice try.. However, you did not provide an answer. I'm not sure why you are trying to make it out like I'm the only one that is not getting it. I havent seen anyone that can explain the 15:20 bar, maybe you have missed all the posts and questions about it the past 2 days??

Disregard that post.... Tums does not know the answer, nor does he attempt to provide answers or help. He actually only offers the opposite of help. His first step is to search for posts that contain similar words, then quotes them, then tries to make you look like an idiot. Surely you have...

Yes, this is a bit confusing. 15:20 is clear as day an FTT of the large up channel. Atleast what we would use to call an ftt before we found out that it must fit the profile of the 3 cases. It is also a double top at a major resistance area, but that is neither here nor there :D

Does anyone know why the 14:05-14:20 sequence is not a peak volume change signal today?

Still holding short TIKI? Looks like we finally got that kick down from the RTL. This could make for a huge down move if i tcontinues...

I dont use the method but read thru the thread. I would just suggest using indexes if you can, would probably be smoother than individual stocks, especially if you are using that short of a timeframe. Also, someone mentioned constant volume bars. I dont recall time based bars ever being...

Sounds like you are trying to make up for the first bad trade, doing things not in your plan (if you have one) that are causing the days to turn out poorly. If you have a positive expectancy on whatever method you are using then it wouldnt make sense to stop trading due to one random trade...

Well it doesnt appear that the 10 minutes he held those trades that the stock was in a downtrend

Hey TNG.. One tip that might help w/ your gaussians. Search for Spyder's comments re: bar coloring. A bar that makes a lower low should be red, along with the corresponding volume bar. See your 11:50 bar for an example. (see how this will change what you have drawn in for the gaussian at...

:D yes..yes it does

Great trade TIKI... I have looked into longer, swing-type trades and would really like to put them on, just as a backdrop to the intraday stuff. I have a hard time looking for WMCN for these types of trades. I think the 'gaps' created by only having RTH on the chart muck things up...

::smacks head:: thanks for pointing that out, I had somehow confused 1+1 = 2 . Perhaps time for a break, thanks guys