Search results

I started a watchlist for MarketGauge's Mish's Modern Family. It is somewhat similar to tracking the S&P sectors.

I put the 200-day SMA back on the chart. In fact, the 100-day RSI mirrors the 200-day SMA almost perfectly. I wonder if we're going to have deja vu of the 2016 post-election bull market. I wonder if I can make 40% profit in MJ after the elections.

I switched back to in at 50 and out at 50 because I'd be out at 55 so often. And I switched to interactive charts because they're more accurate than technical charts. And I changed the name of the trading strategy to Flesh and Blood.

We largely agree on the ranking, but XLV is the only one above 55.

I switched to 100-day RSI only. In at 55 and out at 55.

You take your S&P ETF sectors and you rate them by relative strength and you put your money into the top-rated one, two or three ETFs and rebalance your portfolio as needed and you're supposed to beat SPY about 70% of the time. Beating the market isn't necessarily making money, though, because...

Largely the same as Mebane Faber and Jerry Robinson too. But they rebalance only yearly or quarterly.

I did some tweaking to the Highflier system after the last couple days: Buy funds which are above 55 on the 100-day RSI and above the 200-day SMA. Sell funds which are below 50 on the 100-day RSI and below the 200-day SMA. Get out when you can, not when you have to. Look on the other side of...

I just learned that my Highflier system is largely the same as that of Paul Tudor Jones. Get out of anything below the 200-day moving average and below 50 on the 100-day RSI and be diversified.

Aaugh!! Why do you do this to us?? What are we supposed to do?? Subscribe to your service, I suppose.

AIEQ has got nothing to be ashamed of. I like some diversification anyway.

Spreading the green ETFs bullish against the red ETFs bearish is how to make momentum work? My strategy is almost guaranteed to have value erosion. Buy the best which is about guaranteed to go down, hope it doesn't go down enough I have to sell it. Gotta be in it for the long-term. Hard enough...

And yet no proven profitable strategy. There ain't a lot of profit in these ETFs these days but there sure seems to be a lot of value erosion.

So, you're supposed to keep the five green ETFs for a poker hand and throw away the five red ETFs?

Or you could own only the ETFs above about 53.5 on the 100-day RSI. Be about the same thing. Except sometimes there could be more or less than five above 53.5.

It seems to me tech would be good.

It seems to me commodity ETFs are generally mediocre unless you invest in oil just before a big oil rally or such.

You've got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em...

1. Well, then, hold 'em or fold 'em? 2. XLV, XLY, XLK, XLRE, XLI, XLU, XLP, XLF, XLB, XLRE.

1. Your system doesn't know whether to hold 'em or fold 'em. 2. Your system is limited to ten ETFs.