Search results

Your failure to consider evidence contrary to your political beliefs is not proof that your political beliefs are correct. Here's another one of your buddies rejecting the concept that CO2 is bad for the environment: Jesse Huntley Ausubel is an American environmental scientist and program...

If you look around, you can find a list of publishing climate deniers, LOL. But let's look at a guy who isn't listed on the wikipedia page: James D. Annan is a scientist involved in climate prediction. He was a member of the Global Warming Research Program at Frontier Research Centre for Global...

The IPCC report is written collectively, by a large number of professional climate scientists. And yet you reject it. It's very simple, really. You reject science in favor of politics. Or more precisely, as I've said before, you accept the words of scientists only when they further your...

By making this sort of comment, you're severely undermining your message that "we should listen to the climate scientists". Instead you want us to "listen to futurecurrents", LOL. It's obvious that what you really want us to do is to listen to your political objectives. When a climate scientist...

By making this sort of comment, you're severely undermining your message that "we should listen to the climate scientists". Instead you want us to "listen to futurecurrents", LOL. It's obvious that what you really want us to do is to listen to your political objectives. When a climate scientist...

When I mentioned that warming oceans emit CO2 it was in response to your post, that was responding to a piezoe post, which was about temperatures over the last 25,000 years. Not the last 100 years. And over 25,000 year periods, the amount of CO2 dissolved in the ocean does change due to ocean...

Of course (real) climate scientists are not sure that *all* the global warming is due to man. Here's what the latest (2014) IPCC says about it: Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers IPCC, 2014 The evidence for human influence on the climate system has grown since the...

I've said many times here that I believe that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. But it is also a gas that dissolves in water and when water increases in temperature, CO2 tends to bubble out of it. This is a fact well known to climate alarmists. Again, you're setting up the strawman (or forgetting my...

Zero science content. And again you demonstrate your belief in silly conspiracy theories. "Denier industry", LOL. So you think your opinion on climate science is worth doo doo. I agree. Al Gore's opinion too.

I've told you many times before that I agree that "warming is underway" and that "human activity" is an important cause of it. The debate is not about the existence of global warming or whether or not humans effect temperatures. The debate is about how much. Honestly, cut down on the weed use...

It really doesn't matter what you claim now. What matters is what climate scientists were claiming 20 years ago, when they claimed that "the science is settled" and that the climate was going to be warmer now. Since they were wrong 20 years ago, there's absolutely no reason for us to believe...

An example of climate science's failure to "plan their analysis beforehand" is the fact that, after failing to predict the pause, they're now scampering around changing the definition of temperature. Given a couple hundred idiots trying to find an explanation, it's inevitable that someone would...

The basic problem with climate science is that they run their models without proper controls. It's not the computers or the measuring equipment that causes the problem, it's the researchers. A fact of science (which people outside the field seem unaware of) is that science is done by humans and...

Yep. Exxon's "cutting ties" is from 2007. At that time the climate scientists were still in denial about the pause and even Republican politicians were getting convinced by the evidence. By 2014 it was no longer deniable that temperatures weren't doing what they were supposed to. In addition, a...

LOL!!!

The "Terms of Service and Rules" for Elite Trader include the following: "Registration is limited to one username per member. Elite Trader may, without prior notice, immediately terminate any or all of your accounts after discovering you have registered, and/or posted under, multiple...

and So! You're a conspiracy theorist!

And some more emails... [Ed Cook] So, at this stage I would argue that the Medieval Warm Period was probably a global extra-tropical event, at the very least, with warmth that was persistent and probably comparable to much of what we have experienced in the 20th century. However, I would not...

Regarding "This was all exposed in their climategate emails. In private they admitted that Mann's hockey stick was bogus but they never admitted this to the public because ..." Here are some quotes from the emails. To get more context, names of authors, dates, and a link to the original source...

Here's his post in its entirety: If you want to point out the science content, do tell. Here's his next reply to me: He gets an A- for foul language. An A+ for foul language and an (arts department) A+ for completely avoiding any discussion of the science. The reason he doesn't answer my...