Search results

Heh. +1

ERX/ERY are 3x energy (not just oil) ETFs.

Unbelieveable.

So then you've had this comment directed at you before then.... I see a trend developing. It will, of course, mean nothing to you, for you are oblivious.

A person's brain isn't fully developed until the late 20's. This is well documented. And you're what, early/mid 20's, right? You're a classic case of the Dunning-Kruger Effect. You're too dumb and inexperienced with the subject matter to know just how dumb and inexperienced you are....

"Irresponsible gun owners" were your words. There's no other way to interpret it. You seem to want to say that the gun manufacturers are at fault, or maybe our gun ownership laws though. If so, just say it. Innuendo doesn't play out well on an internet forum. ETA:Yes. I often wonder...

Unbelieveable. So it's the gun owners fault for owning a gun in the first place. And the car owner. And the shopowner for having cash in the till. Ad infinitum......

Just be careful: http://il.youtube.com/watch?v=oEbvDl7rhgg&feature=related :D :D

1- Agree. Merely clarifying the point you were questioning about whether they pay taxes or not. 2- I don't think that most are paid cash. Some are. 3- Those with fake ID's aren't paid minimum wage. Not huge salaries, but not minimum. Construction framers, for example, would make a decent...

1- Cash paid illegals generate local and state revenue through sales tax, gas tax, etc. 2- No. Most have fake ID's

You have no concept of deterrance, do you? Why do secure places sometimes use electrified fences? Is it to kill criminals when they climb over their fence, or to deter them from doing so in the first place? A rational person would say deterrance. What will you say?

A couple of anecdotes doesn't make it a fact. And again, I'll point out to you that I have an agricultural background, and as such have much more experience with these issues than you. I'm pretty positive that I have more years of experience with these issues than you have been alive...

Yep, this is why I stopped responding. I had the impression that dumbass at least knew a little sumtin' about sumthin'. But I was wrong. That statement just proved MY previous statement - that he is too young and inexperienced for his opinion to matter. He's obviously not a college...

Address this. If you dare.

The point is that any responsible parent wouldn't put their kids into that situation. Anyone that does isn't really a parent, but just a sperm/egg donor. And anyone that defends a parent that does, is looking for a vote through wealth redistribution, and having the legal working stiffs pay...

See? You've argued both sides now. Which side will you take now that you've exposed yourself as a liar? No matter what, my point stands. nobody will move into a place if they know for a fact they will be living in cold and darkness.

Yes, I know. But your own statement was that they would turn off the power, etc. NOT that it should never be turned on in the first place. If it is known that they will not be able to get power turned on if they are not able to prove legality, then there are zero surprises. And any...

It's just your own bias that considers Republican statements=they consider them to be sub-humans. They vote Dem cuz they want handouts. And any minority that thinks this is a good life is wrong. It is a shitty life. You cannot dispute this.

I, nor anyone else have anything negative to say about anyone that works and is self supporting. But you are limiting yourself to that select group. If you have not any contact with the group that has zero intention of working - and I most certainly have - you would not make such a blank...

Nobody does. But it doesn't negate the fact that once they're here, the working class supports them to some degree. You cannot dispute that.