Search results

what are you all riled up about gekko? 100k is a bit higher than what most beginning management consultants get, but not absurdly higher. (just think of the contacts the bitch would have!)

exacta(fuckin)mundo! hap, i also happen to appreciate (really!) forceful, compelling posts that don't resort to profanity. but sometimes i'd just rather say what the fuck i want, however the fuck i want to :D

we can laugh now, but i bet even the 'experts' here on ET thought dow 36k was at least possible three years ago.. lol, i love dent's "naz back at highs by 06". :D he's even got a new book coming out touting his views: The Greatest Bull Market in History: 2003-2008 (to balance it out...

i don't see how it's a question of that at all... oh, and there isn't gonna be any 'final judgement' either..

lol. (what wtf was that?:D) i meant: anyone that loses more than his entire equity on the one trade qualifies as an idiot.

m-t is helping you in "scalping dimes" huh? rofl.

ok, so churchill used gas 85 years ago.... whooptee doo! the point is?

i'm on the record as having called VN an idiot. imo, anyone that loses more than his entire equity on the one than his entire equity qualifies as an idiot. that doesn't mean i consider him to be an idiot in every single aspect of his life, or even an idiot overall; from what i've read of...

:D chill candy, i was actually asking an innocent question. i didn't know about the brits and the gas. but re 'the second time', the way you originally phrased your comments ("using saddam as an 'agent'") made it sound like the west wanted some dead kurds, only rather than gassing...

did the brits really do that? sheesh, what dogs.. was there a state of war or something maybe? as for the 'second time', i don't think it was really the west's aim to gas the kurds was it? (or even to harm them at all...) i think you're stretching the truth a bit there candy baby..

man, this is so cool! i CANNOT WAIT til monday... jotted down in my diary in bright big writing... "3/10 12:30 - make me some profitable trades".. guys PLEASE send me your signals on monday.. it doesn't matter what they are, i already have the CONFIRMATION... it's gonna be profitable trades...

gee, what an original question... lol. stick ya head in chit chat once in a while..

would you apply the same logic to the iraq situation?

yeah i agree. that WW2 victory was ILLEGAL DAMMIT! churchill, truman, stalin are CRIMINALS! :D (well, stalin really was, but for other reasons..)

optional, my friends' and family's lives are special to me. so obviously it would be a tragedy to me. but there's nothing inherently special about their lives. as far as the rest of the world is concerned, they're simply human lives, no more no less. i could hardly say that their deaths...

here's my 'other side': who cares when it 'really' begins! the only reason killing is 'wrong' is because, generally, we don't like it. there's nothing about that is intrinsically wrong about it. so when it comes to killing a fetus, it's obvious that hardly anyone really sheds a tear about...

hell no!

i think only a focused effort of igoring vinny is going to take care of this. so, for my part, as fun as it is to spar with vinny, i wont be replying to any more of his posts.

well, dgab was once an art dealer. make of that what you will.

what is so different about doing that and speculating that a company will go bust (lotsa hardship for lotsa people there too, you might even say more so)? i bet you were busy spamming the "don't sell stocks" emails after 9.11 right?