Search results

Umm, why not fruity?

i agree in principal, i'm tired of seeing tax dollars go down the drain housing damn career criminal SOBs. realisically, obviously, it's not going to happen. maybe corporeal punishment and forced labor? well, even that's too much for the liberal pussies (who never fail to astound me with...

you already ARE a target, this war happening or not won't do a damn thing to change that. if you cannot grasp that simple fact then i'm afraid you have no idea of what you talk.

Point Direx: New Pricing: Base Commission: $5 per 1000 shares SOES: $2 per 1000 shares Island: FREE ARCA: $2 per 1000 shares Trac: $3 per 1000 shares NTRD: $3 per 1000 shares BRUT: $5 per 1000 shares BTRD: $5 per 1000 shares DORS: $5 per 1000 shares ATTN: $9 per 1000 shares NYSE...

are you from the future? that would sooo cool! hey, how's shortboy's 'shortgame' in futureworld? Did he get out of the 'bunker'? (if you get my meaning :D)

as the name suggests: the fifty best players

well, if he have to have 10 centres in there, then ewing makes it. otherwise i don't he stays

"in addition to" being the operative words. personally, with unlimited funds, i could think a thousand other things i'd rather do than trade. even a thousand other intellectual pursuits, rather than figuring out trading to the nth degree. the whole question is misguided, as if somehow...

ewing one of the greatest 50 ...yeah right. no way does he make it into that group the next time they do that ranking.. if he does, it's bullshit. he definitely drops off the list before robinson does..

isn't there a 'smoothing' option on your software? mine does. just bump it up to a high enough number until the wiggles disappear. i don't know what this does, but it makes the lines nicer to look at. (and less wiggly)

like most things with nyse trading, you have to learn to deal with the frustration. ps - i haven't

why bother trading if you have unlimited funds..

that's the thing 'cups. you just don't go into daytrading to make 70k/year

"most"? the majority of them? wow. that would really be something. any names your friend would care to divulge? i think stopping before you lost really big does have to be taken into consideration. as far as blowing up goes, we know from the book that richard dennis' accounts lost 50%...

his third is a decent introduction, solid overview of trading fundamentals and some insight into strategies. in and of itself it won't make anyone rich -- it has to be applied -- but there's very little (none) hype and the information is useful, accurate and applicable. if you've had a year...

tough question... the obvious answer is never do it, but things are rarely so simple. i used to do it (average down) if i thought i got a pretty bad entry, but i still liked the trade. paid off handsomely on some occasions, killed me on others. overall, it was a losing experience. i...

that was a definite case of implication. the market being less tradeable today (from an intraday perspective) is not mere 'perception' but veritable fact. just ask all these "I'm having the best days of my life" traders whether they'd prefer the markets of two years ago, or even of one...

perhaps you don't know the definition of "recession" then...

which is exactly the same situation emh is in. i guess trying to dislodge the status quo is alway harder than being it. still, would you wanna bet that as each year goes emh is taken less and less seriously? my guess is that in 10 years time we'll be laughing that we ever believed it.

i, and many others, have given ample evidence on many occasions. no point repeating it all here. anyone doing a search on the subject will find it. as for the number of posts, well, i'm really talented: i can discuss both matters at once. :) btw, it wasn't "whining", it was a carefully...