Search results

Well, your sentence structure is a bit hard to follow but the central point (spend money on alternative energy instead of war) is a non sequitor.

No sorry, I don't ridicule your beliefs, I said they were wrong given our current understanding of the universe. BIG DIFFERENCE. If you want to turn it into ad hominem, so be it. I say for the last time: my beliefs are based on known facts, yours are based on emotion and irrationality. If...

Yes, let's get off the oil and back to stone age! Yee-haw!

Is this supposed to be funny ha-ha or funny weird?

Guess you're just hoping the next suicide plan doesn't land in your neighborhood.

I guess we shouldn't gloat but.... hee hee

You have some mythical man in the sky telling you how to think. How is that any better? :)

He definitely hasn't posted in a while. Maybe he knows shame. :)

Yep, sad. Both parties are tax and spend now. Sigh...

Only six more months and then W is on his own.

Pretty much. Which is why I've all but bowed out of the discussion. I figured my time would be better spent hitting myself in the head with a hammer.

Yes, he weighed 258 pounds but it's not widely known that the man was 7'5". :)

Note too that ART is resorting to ad hominem as he realizes he's losing the argument. The last defense of a truly weak mind. It's fascinating how these irrational types fall back on the same attacks time after time.

A simple comeback from a simple mind. :) If he'd actually think, he might impress me.

Nonsense. There is no such division in evolution as it pertains to the MECHANISM. Don't know why you creationists persist in the artificial division. Oh wait, it's because it's your strawman, without which your argument falls apart.

No, I believe in a rational universe. You believe in slavery. That you can believe that gives you free will is both sad and laughable.

BTW, that's called an Appeal to Authority. You only believe what people in a perceived position in authority believe. That's your weakness. You don't know how to believe the facts by themselves.

Why? You'll only say that scientific evidence is irrelevant when it comes to faith. What's the point, ART? Your irrationality is like a brick wall. You're completely opaque to reason.

Yes, and believing a being whose existence has never been observed much less proven is irrational behavior by definition and yes, therefore, "deemed irrational by any psychological standard."

They'll never stop because they know the moment they do they have to argue on a rational basis and they'll lose. Cuz then they have to start with the following premise: "I believe a man in the sky controls my destiny." LOL