Search results

When the Dems go out on the campaign trail, it goes a little something like this: "Those evil Republicans, they want to starve you, they want to throw your mother out in the street. They don't understand your needs; that you need food for your family, a roof over your head, a cellphone to...

Jem...when are you ever going to learn? NOTHING is beneath him and his band of socialist twats.

Sure is, but completely unrelated to my response.

More like...attempt to outsmart the bureaucrats and politico's who centrally plan the world markets.

In all fairness, there have been some relatively significant pullbacks in just about every year since ZIRP and QE + 1...each one of them started when the Fed went into "bad cop" mode for a few months and threatened to remove the punch bowl. Once they re-assured the "market" that they were just...

He's drunk and trolling you.

And the left does the exact same thing. Are you REALLY this stupid?

Don't tell Richard Rimes about that one. Ignorance truly is bliss.

Exactly right. Yet another reason why the socialists on this site fail every time when they like to draw comparisons to some Scandanavian country in support of whatever new policy they are advocating.

Nope.

Why? because YOU are a gay communist?

You need a new hobby. (and no, your brother doesn't count).

They will pay ALOT more, for lesser care. What is really starting to piss me off are the non-stop apologists who "quote" some monthly subsidized quote and NEVER mention the enormous deductibles. Then again, we are talking about many of the same idiots who couldn't be bothered to figure...

Did you tell your good pal, "Krugger" that the website is experiencing more than intermittent "glitches"?

Taking those projections at face value...with the site "online", they won't be able to finish the thing by 2015.

This has become non stop entertainment. First, the humiliation Sebelius experienced on the Jon Stewart show. Next, it was reported that she couldn't testify in front of Congress, BUT she did have time for some Democratic boozefest in MA (with Chris Matthews to attend). Now, it's some type...

The difference is that in prior asset bubbles, the Fed would EVENTUALLY ACT. As we've seen these past 5 years and running, there is very little that will get these bureaucrats to reign in the excessive liquidity. We get the non-stop double talk about the dual mandate, the good cop/bad cop...

That's your answer right there. We have to remember the number of times the market had sharp pullbacks over the past 3+ years (in the midst of this unprecedented monetary policy)...each time it was the "market" testing the willingness of the Fed to pull back the reigns on this grand...

Once again you prove how oblivious you are to recent history. The "big dogs" are the big campaign donors. You seize those assets and the well runs dry. The "little guy" can't put up much of a fight. Can't hire a connected attorney or even figure out what the hell just hit him. They don't...

and confiscation may occur simultaneously.