Search results

To comprehend the "anti-Christ" one must first comprehend Christ. Christ is a "universe of thought which completes God". This "universe" has no opposite. In Jesus' speak, it is known as the "Kingdom of God". The "anti-Christ" is a concept which says that the Kingdom of God has an opposite...

God is omnipotent, having a monopoly on power. The devil, then, must be a game for "gods"....for a plurality of gods...borrowing/taking power from God. These "gods" seem to come from within the Kingdom of God, from within it's oneness...and go to make their own kingdoms...each going their own...

Before one can even begin to comprehend "the devil", one must first "seek" the meaning of the "Kingdom of God". The K of G is the truth. It has no opposite and comprises ALL. The K o G and Christ are synonymous. It's attributes include an unbreakable oneness. "The devil" is a concept...

The greatest man in the world is the one who relenquishes his (apparent) existence. Christ!

I'll take a try at it. :D As nutmeg mentioned, people don't see the present moment...the unchanging always. What is now is seen through forgiveness of the past/future paradigm...which does not exist in the present...now. They've (past future) never really existed but to impose time on...

I'll second that. And I'll add "blasphemous" to contemptuous. Christ!

It's like inmates in an insane asylum deciding what constitutes real insanity. Write it down and add hundreds of years and thousands of repetitions and it magically becomes the truth. And yet, it doesn't make the scribes any less crazy than they were when they convened to judge what is crazy.

Are you suggesting that stu needs the Judeo-Christian concept of God? :D

Ok. I can't argue with that. What we can do though, is train our minds to accept the suppositions while we are yet dealing with what we believe is hardcore reality...even though it's not. Mind you, it could take years and years of training in what I'll call "forgiveness"...to be able to walk...

Where does it say that in the bible? Christ:D

Time to put the toys in the attic, starting with the original Mr. Egghead, the maker of "the universe".

See my posts above. If this universe is a mechanistic illusion, then it's so-called "life" needs to be redefined. I define it as *liFe*: a lie with a big "F" in it. The "F" stands for feelings of fear. Such a life is for feelings of fear. I propose that minds caught within such a matrix...

Combine these ideas with the idea that "the universe" is the concept of a "dead" Life and, like Sherlock Holmes, we will get closer to solving this case. Think of the universe as a sanitized crime scene...the scene of a murdered reality. What follows is the concept of a living death...a...

The sun does influence thought. Solar tides churn out chi fields that radiate outward and blanket the earth with electromagnetic fields. As brains are walked through them, they are influenced by them. The solar tides are influenced by the planetary motions around the sun. The motions of the...

Where is that in the bible? Christ! :D

The Holy Spirit has promised the Father that he will bring the Son back home. The bible god is the father of all time, all events, all circumstances. So, of course, it can tell what is in the future. It uses the concept of prophecy and fulfillment in support of its own agenda. It's a...

FYI, A Course In Miracles came through Dr. Helen Schucman, an atheistic psychologist. Christ!

Yes, the bible describes the god of "the universe", so-called. In the enlightened language of Jesus, it's called, the "god-of-this-world". The universe is it's "works". But that is not the *Our Father* of Jesus. From the very first sentence, the bible supports the god-of-this-world...

HERE is an exchange between Hooks, resident agnostic, and Jnthn, resident moderator. This is one of the moderators, if not the moderator who mercilessly banned me for posting in areas of the forums reserved for their inside circle of approved orthodox believers. Though I posted on-topic in...

To be honest, going from my experience over at TheologyWeb, I find the agnostics and atheists presenting most honest arguments...except for those few who are already enlightened and naturally at odds with the resident theists. Too bad they are not allowed to present their arguments throughout...