Search results

Especially when you watch the documentary and people weren’t even doing basic due dillligence.

her returns don’t matter. She wasn’t stock picking but rather picking types of companies that she could sell in a fund. She shouldn’t get credit for her fund performance up or down.

she also made like 400mm.

she created a beta fund that the market wanted. you can laugh at her returns but her genius wasn’t stock picking it was in the product she created. When you get this, you will get Wall Street.

I’m beginning to get it as well at least at a high level. This is like the internet in 1994. who knows who will win but whoever does will make a fortune.

that hardly seems revolutionary when you consider how much fraud, theft, and rug pulls there is on crypto exchanges vs traditional ones.

it’s pretty clear you have no info to process or you just make it up in your own head. Clearly the lack of evidence proves warren buffet is guilty.

you insult a guy making an honest living by attacking his profession. remember your post about personal attacks?

Using tax loopholes isn’t objectively immoral. Morality is your construct. Some people don’t buy XOM stock because they think it’s immoral. still a straw man argument.

I am like this in real life. I don’t tolerate illogical arguments very well. So now we went from “it’s all over DuckDuckGo” to “you need the media to tell you what to believe” what do you use to learn things? Facebook memes? Posts on 4chan? Or do you make them up?

so we went from: “It’s all over google” to “It’s all over duckduckgo” to “Warren paid google to hide the stories” to “It’s at the bottom of the search in duckduckgo” All the while you can’t post a link to all the articles you are reading. Please tell me you aren’t like this in real life.

I did before I posted the screenshot. no articles.

While denigrating you on producing for the economy and for your family, M.W. is talking about the morality of life insurance wrappers! traders are the worst people - especially those who engage in financial virtue signaling.

the screenshot I posted was from DuckDuckGo. so no articles then…..

It’s still a straw man argument. You stated that anyone with a finance understanding would know that life insurance is a bad investment for other than it’s intent. I should that’s not correct. And now you are talking about morality.

Stop it. Paying taxes is not some moral high ground. It’s the dumbest form of virtue signaling and you know it. I’m sure you take deductions and and credits where it’s legal. There’s no difference. and this is a straw man argument anyway.

Someone described it as follows: web1 was read (someone posts and we all read) Web2 was read/write (someone posts ans we all can respond and post, but big tech owns it) Web3 is read/write/own (we own what we do)

Please post the links to your articles.

Of course it is. It’s not illegal.

yeah. All those were actually about Sokol (who was the head of his energy company). The article used warren’s name to grab attention.