Search results

Duck is greasy.. why would you knowingly eat a grease? if 'superdelicious' i might risk my health for that fleeting few seconds of palate ecstasy but duck is just a greasy chicken :D

they pull their rod out and you pull your rod out... and that's called "safe"? :eek: "let's arm everyone then no one will dare pull out no rod."

I get the distinct feeling these guys think that if we pass out uzi's to everyone somehow we all get a lot safer. that;s insane :confused:

I get the distict feeling that you are saying "Don't ban anything. If we can get our hands on every weapon that came down the pike we'd all be much safer" Are you saying that NO weapon should be banned? Access to all results in greater safety? Are there any banned weapons that you agree with...

There are abuses of the system everywhere, as long as there are humans we shall have human nature. (What, you never took advantage of a situation ;) But throwing out the baby with the bathwater is not a solution or an option. PLENTY of people legitimately NEED those benefits! They need the help...

I agree with all this but the question remains do we need semi-auto RIFLES for self defense? Why is it so hard for you to say either "yes" or "no"? I'm for removing NEEDLESS potentially dangerous weapons off the street. Who needs this freaking gun so let's get rid of it. BOLT ACTION is all...

RIFLES Try to stay focused, do we need semi auto RIFLES for self defense? why :confused:

Now I know your kidding.. be serious. YOU know as well as I do that no one NEEDS fully auto for self defense. Since by your lack of answer I know you tacitly agree with this... Now, why do we need semi-auto RIFLES for self defense? Not talking about handguns but semi-auto rifles. You've...

Can you give an example of one city's or locale's different needs for self defense than another's? Which city, for example, would need a FULLY AUTO for defense? :confused:

Should NO weapons be banned? Certainly no one is suggesting this, and I am not suggesting banning all weapons. Just those that "overcompensate" as a defensive weapon.

Are you sure she didn't simply wait for the right job for her? certainly you wouldn't want her taking just any offer knowing she'll leave shortly when right job appeared? that wouldn't do her any good and wouldn't do her employer any good either.

Fastest browser on the planet? http://www.pcworld.com/article/190533/opera_updates_web_browser_to_version_105.html

Unfortunately that's the bad with the good. Not much can be done about it except give incentives to find work sooner. But the unemployed still need those benefits!

Unemployment benefits should go only to the working? :p

i was wrong about what? :confused: Obviously, many (if not MOST) weapons need to be inaccessible to the general populace for public safety concerns. My question to you is which would YOU ban, and why?

like a hacker i was trying to find a backdoor in your argument to get a foothold.. :D but i'll come right at ya.. I'm not trying to be funny or clever or moralistic here but simply raise the PRAGMATIC question..are BANS on weapons necessary and which ones? :confused:

Just Like Mombot Used to Make http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/24/dining/24robots.html?partner=rss&emc=rss I'll take a ceasar salad with roma tomato and sprigs of parsley light on the olive oil please :D

no, not even close. I know 86 was the cutoff that is the "compromise" made with the hardcore at the time to get something passed to make the world a safer place at the time. If the facts are so CLEAR and COMPELLING they make us safer why can't we make them anymore? I'll answer for you...

right, but none after '86. why not after this? not a trick question but why not after 86? you are not even allowed to manufacture them!

i don't know what hill your living on but if you own a sub machine gun your a law breaker :confused: Private ownership of submachine guns is illegal in most nation!