Search results

Around or about the time that Senator McCain gave to the FBI his copy of the "dossier" that someone had slipped under his office door, a copy of the original Steele, hand typed dossier, appeared on the internet, there was no indication that it was redacted or in any way incomplete. I haven't...

I can't speak for democrats or republicans but I have to believe, considering how Trump worked out for Republicans, that the democrats are not going to want another showboater, to use a Donald word, as their candidate in 2020. I don't know anything about Avenatti's competence, on that basis...

It is going to be a very interesting case to follow. I haven't had time to study the Judges argument yet, but the brief summary I heard on the radio seems to make sense. I think I would have ruled the same way were I the judge. This will either turn out to be a brilliant strategy by the...

perhaps a little sooner than that.

Did you forget Rudy?

You've got some real important dirt here. Have you thought about starting a podcast on YouTube. You'll have 30 million subscribers in no time.

Or the alternative facts would be that Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI and agreed to cooperate and spill those Russian Beans, so there was nothing left to charge Fynn on with regard to "the Ruskies". That may be what happens when you have a cooperating witness! "You never know, Blanche."

What about Benghazi? It might be time to get that one going again.:rolleyes: Flynn never should have plead quilty. He should have fallen back on the ole 5-day 1-A file rule. :D

Cohen goes to jail in March. So I guess you're right. That is going "nowhere", as you say.

It didn't. but what does that have to do with the reality of the Trump-Cohen illegal campaign contribution case. You're asking the wrong question. You should ask if Cohen has already plead guilty, what are the chances Trump would get off if he plead not guilty to the same crime. There are...

Again, paying out money to women you've had sex with is not the issue! The issue is illegal campaign contributions. It is a felony! Until this can sink in, we will have to put up with more Alan Dershowitz correct, but inapplicable, statements being posted here, I suppose. See my post in...

I believe I heard an attorney say yesterday that the Edwards case was different. Based on the article I've given a link to, it would seem that Edwards was not his own worst enemy, making it far more difficult for the prosecution to gain a conviction -- they failed, whereas the case against...

No kidding. Really now. :rolleyes:

That however is a total mischaracterization of the transaction. It omits the illegal aspect. Dershowitz knows this of course. He knows that he is being misleading when he says things like that that are absolutely correct but at the same time mischaracterize the actual transaction making people...

What a comforting thing it must be to have Hans v Spastic's legal opinion. Let's hope the the Judge has read it. And now, if we can just get rid of those damn tapes.

I imagine Flynn was totally unaware he was lying. :rolleyes: And then Bam. he's caught in that damn trap. :D

Indymac however was a bank. Your money is safe in any bank covered by FDIC. Furthermore your check drawn on any bank covered by FDIC will always timely clear regardless of whether the bank is solvent or not -- Assuming you have deposited money to cover it of course. That's the beauty of the...

Usually the opposite actually. You offer a higher rate when the risk is greater.

So his son is also a criminal??? Who knew!

Maybe populist scum and smarter than Trump?