Search results

Why would mexico pay to buy a ticket on a sinking ship?

there is some excellent 5th grade arithmetic being exhibited in the lower photo, but also some 5th grade logic. The later is more characteristic of the U.S. alt right, or, in other words, Putin's St. Petersburg boys, than it is of the Canadian electorate.

Why not start by buying Mexico? Once he owns Mexico he can make them pay for his wall.

Perhaps of interest is: mobile.twitter.com/housejudiciary/status/11610496228 sorry the above link does not work. Search for nadler collins letter house judiciary Committee.

Although bonds seem to be necessary to finance government debt, today they actually serve quite a different purpose.

I want to remind everyone of something i have already mentioned in other similar threads, but it is key to understanding why we have laws in the first place, so i think it is worth repeating. For example, Banning, i.e. making illegal, a certain type of magazine or gun will not guarantee that...

the fact remains that no one with any chance of influencing legislation is seriously screaming for banning all guns. Some people believe that we would be better off without guns and have said so. But this comes under the "wishful thinking category" . It is pointless to discuss gun regulation...

It would certainly be unexpected were the Trump administration, by some strange accident, to appoint only Democrats as U.S. Attorneys. Nevertheless we have all observed, common sense notwithstanding, that no matter how absurdly illogical an hypothesis or accusation may be it is bound to gain...

the real question is : Where does this crap come from?

I would say the opposite is true. The U.S. dollar is the safest at the moment because it is still the reserve currency and there are consequently huge stores of dollar denominated assets and dollar foreign currency reserves in central banks around the world. There are forces at play that...

If you have any interest in what i'm saying, and you quite obviously don't, you could read my posts.

As i said, unless "wishful thinking. " Thank you for making my point by not being able to find a single example of any serious proposal, i.e. proposed legislation, to ban all guns. It is not gone to happen. Why do you bother with this nonsense. Why not discuss the real proposals that are out...

Again, you won't find any prominant politician in the house or senate who is seriuosly proposing that we ban all civilian ownership of guns in the U.S. That would be impossible without amending the constitution. I invite you to examine your logic with regard to the statement that criminals...

I may be mistaken, but i am not aware of any prominant politician, unless taken out of context in some edited video, for example, calling for banning guns in the context of all guns. Such a ban would require amending the constitution. I would very much like to see even a single example of any...

I don't think i said you were a radical. However i believe you are being unduly influenced by radicals. You're being reasonable as far as i can tell.. That's what we all need to be. The idea that adoption of uniform, federal gun laws would lead to government confiscation of most or all guns...

It seems you are under the influence of radical elements that are out there, to be sure. There are also moderate voices. These are in the majority; they will prevail.

Wouldn't it make sense to stick with discussion of actual proposals before Congress right now, as these have at least some non-zero chance of being enacted. No pending federal legislation would prevent you from having a working firearm in your home, if that's what you want.

he may not know what "per capita" means. In any case, it is nearly impossible to have a reasonble dialog with these folks because their reasoning borders on the absurd.

Well it turned out to not be radical at all in that sense, as Iran held to their side of the agreement. Of course it was always understood that eventually they might renew there enrichment program. And now of course that is a looming reality with our withdrawal from the agreement we signed. I...

I am curious. Why do you consider returning Iran's money that we had impounded in exchange for Iran's agreeing to halt their fissionable material enrichment program as "radical."