Search results

Either Roberts will rule on the question or it will go directly to the full Court on an expedited basis and the answer will come down in a few days. Just as Bush v Gore was handled. that took 4 days.

I am going by what Lev Parnas said about him. Also there is a new book out by two well known WAPO reporters, "A Very Stable Genius," which confirms that the President has hired people after chatting with them a few minutes and without much background checking. Which partly would explain the...

Sadly, yes. Completely true. I wish it were not so.

Thanks for posting. The world now operates on a productivity standard. As a practical matter productivity is usually demand limited. What can't be sold will not for long be produced. This together with the amount of money, dollars in the case of the U.S., will be the ultimate factor in...

Mr. Trump doesn't read, but if you can make it to the Trump Hotel in D.C., wait for him at the bar. He comes in often. Introduce yourself and tell him what a great man he is. He'll hire you on the spot as an economic advisor.

He is a certified lunatic and idiot. I suppose that is the best explanation on why he would lump Teddy in with Wilson . Speaking of National Parks, B1S2 would probably be fine with Coca Cola Corp taking over Yellowstone and running it like "a real Republican Business," just like Comcast or...

It is not at all clear to me on what basis you would characterize Teddy as dangerous to your Republican Republic. Certainly I can't understand lumping him in with Wilson, who was a danger to our democracy. Despite Teddy's show of regulating Trusts, he was thoroughly Republican in his support of...

Ha ha ha. Well, yes. But is it because they (we) were white? Probably not. I'm sure volumes can, and have been, be written on this topic. Volumes I have neither the time nor inclination to read. But I have always thought that religion would be a good jumping off place for research. And too...

I made a mistake. I said, "most prophetic". It is not. Other editorials have been equally so. I should have said "most important," because if the American experiment in democracy in the form of a republic begins to die with Donald Trump in 2017, this editorial may have explained why. It is...

agree, but don't agree with the explanation. It goes right back to spain and portugal, and the heritage of these countries, not to dna -- though to be sure the dna is there also..

One can only do so much. Then it is up to each of us to pay attention.

It would be foolish for me to attempt to make the argument over again in this forum. I will accept that not everyone could, or did, hear the opening argument.

That would be a step in the right direction.

Although it is impossible for the opposition party to launch an impeachment without "going after" their political opponent* it doesn't logically follow that in doing so they are necessarily "abusing government." This is weak thinking on Paul's part. One way to look at the impeachment hearings...

If the author is right , this may be the most prophetic editorial ever published in an American Newspaper about our 230 year-old constitutional, democratic , republic. To echo Franklin, it may explain why we couldn't " keep it."

You should have watched the opening arguments. Might have learned something about impeachment they didn't teach you in law school.

I just noticed this now. ;) Well that's it then he says his motives were pure. He's innocent! How could we have been so wrong?

We knew Trump was a narcissist and a psychopath, but we haven't been paying enough attention to Giuliani's mentally unhinged state. They are made for each other, that's for sure.

The impeachment hearings will be archived so you can still see them even if you missed them in real time. Although no specific statutory crimes are being alleged, there were of course statutory crimes committed. The crimes alleged, however, are of a higher order than statutory crimes, i.e...

Thanks for posting this.