Search results

Interesting enough, the minutes of the last Feb meeting pointed out the "anecdotal reports that speculative demands were becoming apparent in the markets for single-family homes and condominiums". But I think Greenspan is doing too little and too late to cool the housing inflation...

These losses are considerly larger than the numbers Max Haller gave to me. Make me wonder what is going on.

Very interesting. Last Friday (July 23) Max sent me a message about the fund performance. On that same day he was gone. Now I don't know if I should believe the number he told me. The number Max gave me is not too bad, given how the other funds are doing. Now Max's departure throw...

Really? Just on July 23 he send me a private email.

Down 1% last year? Can you say more about the mistakes so that other beginners can learn? Thanks.

I remember there is a study ( by society of individual investors ? ) that the method produced a decent return, about 20 %, from 2000 to 2003. This surprised me, as I thought it worked only in booming markets. Don't know how the study is conducted, though. A colleague of mine is a fan of...

I read in Barron that the housing contribution to cpi in 2003 decreased 8 % from 2002. in contrast to the huge appreciation of house prices last year. No wonder cpi underestimates the inflation.

sorry for being dumb, but what is swing trading exactly?

He should become a talk-show host, with a name like, G-Span.

yet another guy who want your money

It is interesting that Greenspan said derivative is good. In particular, he said that banks did fairly well in 2000-04 despite of Enron, Worldcom, largely because of credit derivatives. Whom do you believe? Buffet or Greenspan?

Is it true that 70 % of day traders loss money??? On the other hand, 30 % of day traders make money, possibly from those losers.