Search results

are you trying to day you are a first generation business man. that you did not work for a company or a father to get experience?

how? back tests on indicators are misleading......

I am betting yours is not a business you have started, you must have watched and learnt from your father. if you have to learn this business ideally you have to learn it the same way. you have to spend a minimum of 2-4 hours everyday to learn about this trading. you may have to spend time for 5...

ooooh you are the smartest one

sorry but I want to make money...... not make a reputation of how smart I am. get in later but you can use bigger positions and since everybody is doing that, you get the biggest movement. even when you predict it correctly, no one else will be with you, and you have to sit and wait for ever...

more is not always more of good.....it may be more of bad!

I was about to suggest the same thing.

watch the financial magazines for his [I always win] photo on cover

I prefer confirmation.....rather than prediction....but that may be just me

risk reward probability are 3 things generally considered. but is probability the same thing as context?......context is either bull or bear for a particular time period....I say time period and not time frame because even on one time time frame chart, the area where bull resides and bear...

any system is limiting. why have a system here?

why bother

sold near yellow line......trend down context down...….why worry about the ratio risk reward ?

expectancy comes with being in synch with context. I am now concentrating on seeing a context and holding the trade till the context changes.it is context that decides which trade signal I take. and it has made trading extremely easy for me I see no point in closing the trade at a particular...

you will not get it. high probability, and high reward is a mirage. that is why all fraudsters promise it..

if probability is high it would be nonsense to go for a reward more than 1

I do not remember. but I remember trend. that was always in my face. but my exact words,easily verifiable,were "as far as my memory goes, I may be wrong, but only one book -Brooks-mentions context." even Brooks does not explain it thoroughly. because the context does change as the market goes...

I have never wanted, as all the books advice, to make 50% a year. i was never in it..... to make money. I was in it..... to be always right. I believed, it is possible to be always right. that anybody who thought other wise was wrong. and that, the returns possible by being right, would be...

more in 30 years

I am really getting confused. you come and say I want to trade...... so tell me indicators to use then you say I want to buy long term because I may lose. if you do not think you can make money......then why bother. don't.