Search results

It's no surprise it would be troubling to a scientist that an answer may not be forthcoming to a scientific question . You read all sorts of weird things like creators designers magic and woo into that, for no good reason. You like what scientists say so much listen to Hawking. The G word...

Grasping at straws again. For 5-7 years you said no scientists say there is an appearance of fine tuning. I have never said any such thing. An appearance of fine tuning BUT.... is not fine tuning. You have never been willing or able to explain how the appearance of fine tuning (whatever...

Then he is saying there is a constant that is not appearing fine tuned! Isn't it the creationist's argument that all the constants fit into a tiny set of values and therefore the universe must be fine tuned. So as each constant gets to be explained, the fine tuning pseudo-argument diminishes...

If a great scientist states there is an appearance of fine tuning BUT...says before or after that remark... "I don't think there's really any evidence of very precise fine tuning of the constants of nature." "Well, the fact that there is such an energy level at just that energy...

If you are not interested in the subject matter or the basic difference between right and wrong, then maybe it is noise to you.

Which part of the vid did you not hear Weinberg say .... "I don't think there's really any evidence of very precise fine tuning of the constants of nature." "Well, the fact that there is such an energy level at just that energy does not require a fine tuning of it " "I don't think it...

You remind me of someone with nothing to contribute.

Stephen Weinberg states "I don't think it requires a fine tuning of the constants of nature." Stephen Weinberg states "I don't think it requires a fine tuning of the constants of nature." You're missing something, it's known as rationality but like I say, you are religiously...

You could, but you prefer to make a pathetic excuse for not doing. You do no such thing What you give is inane repetitions of the the same truncated out of context edited mine quotes and sound bites that present false distorted and opposite impressions about what is actually said. Weinberg...

"I am not a birther" ....yet all evidence leads to the contrary that both those remarks of yours are not true. ..yet you could have easily brought up one of the many original vids of that interview that hasn't been adulterated with childish comments.

sweet.

.....constantly trolling the same dead arguments over and over when they have already been debunked.

That's not what he said or suggests.

Intentionally or wilfully stupid whilst trying to sound intelligent is a fair summary of Jem. However I would say constantly trolling the same dead arguments the way he does, over and over when they have already been debunked as many times, is energetic I agree, but I wouldn't call it...

Not true. You've merely misquoted a few scientists who used the phrase the universe appears fine tuned, but who then continue to explain why it isn't. Hawking has said it's all down to Gravity not god anyway, so any appearance of fine tuning does not need anything else like a tuner, divine...

... like buying all the lottery tickets and putting a win down to random chance .

No good blaming me because neither your argument or position make any sense. Nothing said about opposite meanings. Show how "the authority of dictionaries" lol have the words inevitable consequence and random chance meaning anything like the same thing. I suppose you will troll out...

Don't be so ridiculous. The words inevitable consequence and random chance and divine creator don't mean the same in any dictionary. Your choice between two pairs of those words is false dilema by any standard, including a dictionary's. Bottom line is for some weird thing you need to hang...

I never said it was a misrepresentation to say "random chance". I said your fictive choice between whatever you mean by "random chance" and a divine creator is a false dichotomy. The misrepresentation comes in the way you try to misunderstand what science and scientists say, just to...

Yeah yeah, it's all troll bullshit just because your creator nonsense can't deal with it. It's self evident. A natural occurrence with an inevitable consequence leads to a consequence which is inevitable. duh That's hardly what ever it is you mean by random chance and certainly requires...