Search results

lol. I am going to wait for 1400.20 , then we will have a confirmed bottom, then I will be absolutely positive I should have bought it.

I just went in a little, looking for some whiplash. Pretty timid trade though, not looking for all in yet.

but...but he says he is profitable, and he knows all about cycles, he has the word grand in his alias, and he called the top...and he is a guru- he has a blog. Your analysis must be wrong

yeah but all the followers of grandstupidcycle are now wiping their asses with $100s, so take that

spreadem was long, that's funny

Humans create their own environments, so instead of giving them yet another excuse, ask why the black environment is always so destructive and violent. <iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/U8vLgYNaBb0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> Thanks libs...

the only cosmic law at work here is the law of never ending stupidity

Mancaves are kind of cool, but boycaves?? I dunno about that one... x-boxes, red bull cans everywhere, megan fox posters, HD streaming porn. It could be ok except I'd have to put a lock on the door to keep my mum out.

and the fed will buy them?

-George Will (July 2011) But I only want to quote Clinton, and once again point out the housing ownership bubble that started in 1994. Liberalism is far more effective than war at trashing ones economy.

Clinton threatened to extend CRA if banks didn't fall in line, it was a club used to bash banks into subprime. I don't care about your anecdote, it proves nothing. Later the markets discovered securitization as a response to subprime, and viola, bubbble+meltdown.

Right, fuel for the fire, and so the house flipping began. Enhanced because you could buy with little down which in turn was because lenders were pressured by liberals.

I don't know how to say this any different. If you do forensic accounting, of course you cannot find CRA's fingerprints on everything since the prime cause is far removed from final effect in the nonlinear process known as history. The important question to ask is what happened in 1994. Maxine...

It implies that you are going to pretend that it all fits within your predictive scheme.

lol, I don't want to ruin it for you. emmm mmmm good cracker

Time to turn off the computer and turn on Matlock and Wheel of Fortune

Impedance of free space, You must have meant 2004 and 1994. Clinton was president in 1994 and neither the housing market nor the economy was overheated. The key is 1994, that's the genesis.

You missed the whole point here, and people with higher risk SHOULD pay more interest as that is exactly how a loan market works. What the hell are the poor doing taking out home laons anyway? I said the fingerprints of CRA were not directly on the majority of loans, however CRA clearly was...

I know we are sick of this, but in reading seeking alpha this chart really sticks out Notice the keys years, especially 1994. 1998 and 2004 were also important. I can't quite figure 1998 out except that the markets and growth were really hot then. 2004 is interesting, W was calling for...

bold emphasis mine- Notice the jump to the huge fallacy of the excluded middle here, and the lack of mention about deficit, it's needed to put a pretty bow on this or else the entire argument falls apart. I don't understand why we are all still playing political games here while our home is...