Search results

Ultimately Trump has one hurdle that's way higher than any Wall that Mexico "will pay for": It is the monumental stupidity of a border wall as though it were 1961 and the United States was East Germany! In this day of modern surveillance technology and speedy response capability an ugly wall...

No doubt he'll try. Yah, Donald is quite the dealer! He'll soon enough be dealing out cards for a round of canasta (isn't that played with two decks?) in the game room at a nearby minimum security Federal Prison. I wonder if "Lives of the Rich and Famous" will do a special live broadcast with...

Isn't the New York Post basically a muckraking rag in the spirit of William Randolf Hearst, and now Murdoch. I can't think of anything that would please these unprincipled purveyors of nonsense more then to have their papers, and now news channels, taken seriously. Hearst was credited with the...

So, what's the point?

vast majority of Americans agree, of course. But it can't be done with an executive order!!! And thank god for that! We need a President who understands how things must be done under the rule of law. Otherwise you don't have a democracy, as defective as that form of government is, you have...

Merry Christmas to you as well, HO HO HO..

Well OK, If you say so. :D

I completely agree. And I greatly exaggerated any interest Putin may have had in the penthouse that Donald threw in, probably unnecessarily, as inducement to get Putin firmly on board. Donald wanted the Tower. Putin Wanted the Sanctions lifted. Putin saw that he could use the tower project to...

what documents??? The documents implicating people in the administration in law breaking? Those documents? Those weren't produced so Nunez wouldn't be able to give them to the people under investigation before the investigation was finished. But don't worry, all those documents will be...

The tower project wasn't canceled. It was merely postponed. There was a stumbling block to be got over: The financing! The tower could not go through unless the sanctions were lifted. Trump could not influence the lifting of the sanctions unless he was President. Vladimir could not get his...

Obstructed by who? The Republicans were in full control of both houses? How did the "obstructors" prevent indictments??????? I'm waiting to hear..

I wonder how a comparison would look between time, money and results for investigating Benghazi, the IRS, the FBI, the DOJ, the Steele dossier and the investigation of the Comey-Mueller investigation versus the Comey-Mueller investigation. Anyone have any numbers?. I'm thinking...

What does this say about Bernie's pragmatism, and manners? I think it say a lot. I admire someone who can accept the current reality, make what they can out of it, and keep pressing on.

You have, in all probability, masterfully opined as Hillary Clinton would, if indeed she could bring herself to be completely candid. Well done!

We don't. My, bad. I should have said no one but you perhaps, has suggested, so far as I know, that she did anything illegal with Party money. I just made the assumption that there were so many pissed people when they found out that she was treating party election campaign money as if it were...

I thought Florida was a stand your ground state??? This was interesting. https://abcnews.go.com/US/floridas-stand-ground-law-determine-zimmerman-dunn-cases/story?id=22543929

I can hardly stand it. I'm like Cartman who couldn't wait for the new Wee to come out. He had to be frozen in his Mom's freezer and then thawed when it finally appeared. When are we going to get to 2550-2500? I've got my puts lined up ready to sell, but the market just won't cooperate. I...

ExGoper may not have commented, but the Party certainly did not "totally ignore" Hillary's escapades. It was a big deal among democrat party stalwarts. She didn't do anything illegal under party rules, but she was unethical as hell. It wasn't her lack of Sunday School manners that...

I did read what you posted actually. You have a point. I doubt the UK authorities have overlooked it however.

thank you for helping to make my point, that the ad hominem attack has become the refuge of those who can't sensibly argue the science.