Search results

Not surprising, since it is believed 95% of traders lose their money. One expects the nonfunctional methods to be in the lead.

This is your third (currently) non-banned thread. Are you trying to keep ahead of the mods?

You also hear voices, so it is hard to give credence... What I hear when you speak is a multi-alias.

+1

this isn't your journal. start your own

You have 7 total posts, all for this website. I think you are the best evidence against yourself.

CO2 produces about 1/3 less CO2. IT also produces far less of other pollutants

Yes, why would they ban someone who says he will start with $700 and be at over $170K in 65 days, all the while doing nothing but trying to get massive attention so he can later sell his wares? Making claims he doesn't need money because "you can see me as an owner of a top 500...

Have you ever been a successful trader or run a company? If so, you would have answered your own question, rather than coming across as a totally green & uninformed newbie. Seriously... Fewer than 1% of traders will ever become longterm, lucrative traders. It is worth a fortune to find...

Quote from dtrader98: Bizarre to those who didn't make it past k-12, perhaps. Sorry, keep working on it and you might just get that GED... But I forgot-- this is elite trader, not competent scholar. And you think clever taunts painting others as noncompetent makes yourself as as...

As opposed to someone shooting for 100 aliases. Sorry, but an insult from mommy's boy has no bite...

On the contrary. These are already starting to be used, and are expected to cut oil use 30-35%:

Some how, that would not surprise me...

Honda will not stay there. I don't think Toyota is setting any records either. But Honda and Toyota cars outrank anything else on the road for longterm reliability. Assuming auto sales recover sometime soon, they will be on top.

yes, except almost 100% of traders cannot do it. The risk management side FOLLOWS a longterm edge. If it was that easy, there would be a lot more traders making their $100K plus a year. The results in this and other trading sites kind of argue against that, though

people "who were long" has absolutely nothing to do with timing the low in march. No one can do this regularly, so it is a pointless argument.

No one in the world has this ability. Usually, those picking tops and bottoms are always being surprised that the trend persists, rather than turning on wave C or oscillator X, etc. As someone once said, "The Market can be irrational longer than you can be solvent."

Since 99+% of these things are trash, and the OP is an unknown, and the website is unknown and it depends on freebie ads, the probability of "useless" is off the charts. Only an absolute newbie with a death wish would be sending this kind of money to an anonymous poster. This is the kind of...

Most shills would only cherry pick an example, as above. Reliable people are more likely to have many posts. Shills like this generally have few, and issue glowing reports.

Seems a lot easier to keep it in the ground. Oil is finite. The oil producers manage to keep shooting themselves in the foot, promising each other to cut production, then cheating on their quotas. If they cut another 25% of production, OPEC could rule the world and get $100-$150 a...