Search results

You're quibbling about default again . What's the matter with you? You can't make a reasonable argument against the reality that no default was filed and another load of birther bullshit hit the deck in court. Those are the facts.

It comes as no surprise you can't follow a sentence containing more than one comma. But don't worry, Lucrumb in his usual leaning toward nonsensical birthers like yourself and Jem will hypocritically attempt to shift what you've rather unsuccessfully tried to do onto to someone else...

That's not true. :p Never said any different about procedure and the courts. Do try and at least comprehend the simple part. The claim fell flat on its ass. Again. Over 80 attempts and it fails every time. That would be because it has no standing in Georgia, in the courts, or in law. The...

What crap you come out with jem-o-loon. Biggest loon of them all. Trying to verify a candidate has proof of eligibility by means of groundless claims without any foundation whatsoever, and refusing the statements of sworn notaries, and trying to re-interpret the Constitution against all...

You are quibbling about what is the definition of default, nothing else. There are numerous reasons why in law the definition or an appearance of default may not have actually occurred. That is why there is also a definition of vacate. Even Judges may consider a default has occurred where...

The law apparently "bothers" to keep a well funded group of conspiracy birther nutjobs encroaching on the constitution. Thank goodness for that at least

Talk about troll bullshit. Coming from you, that's rich. No, I'm not arguing against Black's I'm arguing against you. You're pettily bickering about an alleged default when all the time the Judge will decide on the circumstances, if there was in fact, default. You don't, neither does...

It's perfectly obvious not being granted a motion to quash a subpoena, does not itself establish the power of the issuing authority . There is argument whether the subpoena power of Congress is absolute never mind that of an Administrative Judge trying to subpoena a President, and in Georgia...

Talk about blatant back peddling, so much so now you've met yourself going backward. What about this....... Not a default in this instance. You've now conceded that much above, in your usual dishonest way . Now you say it's to "risk a default judgment " What suddenly happened to your...

If you're all that bothered about this zombie thread you might be better asking your brain dead weather reporter to stop resurrecting it with more birther horseshit long after it had gone quiet.

Oily Titz, filed suit. A motion to quash was filed. Administrative Judge, not a trial judge, says he wants a hearing. There is no subpoena with authority to make Obama appear. In all practical and legal respects, Obama could not actually default, as the Georgia Administrative Court does...

"failure to respond to a summons and complaint served on a party in the time required by law." Contrary to your uninformed conclusions, Obama was not summoned to appear. How exactly is it a default not to respond to something not there. Already said, Under State Law a Georgia...

"Actually the Constitution says he must be eligible." So what the hell is all your 'Supreme Court needs to define natural born citizen' trolling bs for then. I realize you're confused but it's more of a batshit version of befuddled you have there really. What happened in Georgia is that...

Yes exactly you idiot. The Constitution and the law. There is a process in law for challenging eligibility. In law you need a true, proper and legitimate claim for it to succeed. That is what 'we' have. Constitution and law is what you as a birther like to demand, but don't follow. If...

You need to correct yourself. The Judge didn't grant a default judgment. You come back here in all your stupidity changing this into a discussion about default judgments, so you say it's me changing this into a discussion about default judgments. sheesh.. how do you get through a day...

"That is a default." Wrong, Mr Armchair Lawyer. That is not a default. It is only a default when the Judge orders it to be a default. The Judge will have advised the plaintiffs he was prepared to enter a default, however the plaintiffs wanted their day in court. Just like you, as a...

Without true, proper and legitimate cause, no.

I doubt you could accurately predict what the time will be in one hour. The problem with your particular lame birther idea is the only people who still want a birth certificate to be presented in Court under oath are the few conspiracy theorist birther loons such as yourself, who can't deal...

Evidence proffered and authenticated against what exactly Jem-o-loon? The thing that keeps carrying the day in Court for around 80 times!! now, is the fact that there is nothing at all to warrant the proffering of evidence for authentication. Lol. You're still pining over birther birth...

Default in this case always was and is an irrelevant technicality. It would no doubt have been used as more out of control spin by birthers had one been given, but it wouldn't have changed a thing in the end. The birth certificate nonsesnse that is put up as some kind of a claim has no legs...