Search results

....then science is fact without conclusion, religion conclusion without fact.

....man is reading the mind of God perfectly, whenever it conforms with what man believes.

1. Yes, your posts ARE angry, zealous, abusive, ignorant , arrogant and illogical. 2. Read the passages again. Your reasoning is twisted. Nowhere in that link you made to 'Infidels' does it provide ANY basic or classical historical evidence that Jesus did ever exist. That's YOUR...

I made no such claim on page 41 or elsewhere. Link the post. You too have "used the word 'certainty' "... Are you trying to be clever? Seeing things that aren't there are you... or just incapable of reading properly? The only one claiming certainty is you, on my behalf. That...

Obviously you see no sense of fun or irony in my reply. Nevertheless perhaps then, YOU should brush up on YOUR axioms and your math. Axioms by definition can indeed be non-logical. Now with that 'big grin' you look a dick. "I believe in a God because it is the logical thing to do."...

lol Managed to log into ET without help from your other schizo alias today Jem? Slammed by the Bible too. How much worse could you do. Obviously with no sensible or valid ordinary or legal concept of hearsay, couldn't spell cite and haven't been able to apply even the basics of hearsay...

Self evidently not a logical axiom.

A proven THEORY is a fact ! Scientific theories which become proven, constantly become scientific facts. I claim certainty is not required. You claim I preach certainty. You're making a false claim. You claim something "All-Knowing". You claim an absolute. Self contradictorily you...

Every time you get a link or a reference, you misread, misrepresent, misunderstand , dismiss, abuse or deny it. Here is what your own infidel’s link actually says in its context, and not via your bigoted selective viewpoint. Opinion about this passage is mixed. Some scholars...

Why not try to stop being so angry , aggressive and abusive all the time and actually address the issue. It's not complicated . Just answer the points already raised against the historically unsubstantiated claims you've blindly fallen for.

I suggest that is a personal belief, not an externally valid logical one.

Constantly trying to peddle a false assertion by committing certainty, absolutes and “All-Knowing” on my behalf , does not demonstrate that you are pursuing an honest argument. Of course scientific theories can be proven. Obviously they continuously have been and are. You'r saying...

If you can't even figure how to sign into ET as jem on your "work machine".... ...you're not honestly expecting to comprehend Hawkin's explanations are you? Interesting to dubious multiple split personalities like yourself perhaps, who like to pretend people say and mean things they...

Oh dear... I see you're having another identity crises relapse Jem. Will you be Jem this time but speaking as res judicata, on behalf of Jem, as before. You know, like schizophrenics do? If you are genuinely ill that way, you really should seek professional help. You have no...

think you'll find his quote says ... "Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going."

....except that the laws of physics allow for a universe from nothing, whether you believe them or not.

He's Jem-esque..and he's cornered .. that's probably as near to insane as it gets.

I know, of course the Universe could not come about from nothing, but a make believe magical cloud fairy that came about from nothing, made the universe from nothing. Is that it?

well... he's marrying your daughter isn't he?

The laws of physics allow a universe to come from nothing.