Search results

No one has that kind of time.... Piezone did not ignore Marbury... he said the exceptions clause raises an interesting point even though it was only used a few times in history. I raised the point that the exceptions clause main case was over a political issue and not any existing or...

You BirthingPeople Fucker... nah. MotherFucker still sounds better

I am sensing that people are saying that with vaccination rates lower and cases rising, someone in charge should step up and take all the blame!

I hate when all politicians do this.... My Dad was a janitor... My Grandfather came to this country... My son is in the service... My wife is a .... I swear in 2020 and 2016 the primary candidates on both sides kept repeating these things like it made them special...

Actually I do think a baker should make a cake for a gay couple because: Baking a cake is not forcing you to engage in the lifestyle Baking a cake is what you do and would do for any customer and you benefit from state and federal business laws Baking a cake for a gay customer is the same as a...

The problem with the law is right now it is in texas... maybe a few other states are adopting it...but it needs to be made into a large issue of violating the implied privacy clause of the 14th Amendment which was relied in Roe V. Wade. I believe a case befroe the SC would find the Texas law...

You do realize Marbury v. Madison was quite controversial since a branch of government claimed a power NOT granted to it by the Constitution about 20 years after the Constitution was ratified.... You even said it yourself.... judicial review is NOT FOUND within the text of the Constitution. We...

I dont think anyone is saying she has a legal recourse since she can go some where else...we are just saying it is a petty move.

Excellent discussion! To cut to the chase I dont think Congress will be successful in codifying Roe v. Wade because well its Congress and they cant get anything right even when one party has a majority. I think Texas opponents will find another way to challenge this quickly and a big battle...

Refusing to give her a test is just being petty.....you want to speak out and respond to her social media or comment publicly go ahead. But acting like a child and saying we will not allow you to get any medical procedures or test here because we dont like your politics is close to a violation...

Let's look at it this way.. The suggestion is that Congress codify the exact ruling in Roe v. Wade and subsequent cases that had any clarifications. Congress does this. How do you challenge the constitutionality of a law that was written based on the constitutional decision of the Surpeme...

You should read the other parts of what you cited....: Numerous restrictions on the exercise of appellate jurisdiction have been upheld. E.g., Congress for a hundred years did not provide for a right of appeal to the Supreme Court in criminal cases, except upon a certification of division by...

i am not weighing in on what the court did, I am just asserting the claim that Congress cannot pass a law and as part of that law make it illegal or prohibit judicial review of a valid challenge to the constitutionality of the statute. That would go against everything the Constitution stands...

Cannot happen sadly.... only thing that can happen is lower courts reject a challenge to the law and SC declines to review case but Congress cannot usurp the constituion.

In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make. You are misreading this I think... Congress created lower federal courts of appeals such as the...

There are other courts empowered to hear appeals such as Administrative courts of appeals. congress cannot exempt a law from judicial appeal because it is part of the role of the Judiciary. An exception as Congress may make may change the PROCESS basically. Congress cannot legislate out the...

THe SC was simply punting because it probably needed to go through the lower courts first. You think the SC wants to be inundated with thousands of emergency actions over abortions, guns, prayer, meetings etc.... Also since they are Conservatives it allows them to decide without deciding...

To be honest I am not surprised the SC decided not to handle a topic like abortion through an emergency basis.... doubt it is something they want to rush a decision through so was just too easy to punt and see if it comes back later... First place to challenge the law is in the legislature and...

Wow... ok I tried to right this in crayon if it helps... Despite this being Biden's fuck up, I continue to wonder why all these loud cons were so quiet when trump went out and negotiated with the people that were not only NOT in power but also responsible for killing Americans. That is why...

:)