Search results

you only need to focus on the important variables.

“ignore” so that they can read your drivel while you can’t read their prose.

Since these are indisputable facts, you can present data to support them, normalized for societal inequalities. This should be an easy task: you are a man after all.

hahahahaha.

99percent of the traders on this site couldn’t have traded their strategy 30 years ago.

There’s a constant trend of increased transparency, liquidity, and access to the markets and financial products. It can be very disruptive for individual traders and trading firms.

his pants never look like they are on backwards.

someone with dementia and a penchant for temper tantrums and who is surrounded by people who won’t tell him the truth could easily do it.

disagree. Electronic trading, computing power, improved access to financial products, financial Innovations of new products, and the financialization the economy over the last 25 years have changed the markets and the economy forever.

Can you cite statistics that are normalized for societal inequalities? It’s nature after all so this should be easy to do. For example a study showing women in leadership positions in Saudi Arabia. That’s clearly proof that they lack the same leadership skills as men.

You kept saying no one is listening to you so I responded. Otherwise I wouldn’t have.

Ive read your posts. You are out of your depth here. But it’s too much typing to correct you as others have already.

it depends on your view and what the market is pricing in relation to that. (The implieds and stock prices)

totally different trade.

anyone who knows anything about the industry knows there’s a big difference between earning 10mm PA and running a billion dollar fund. That’s like saying “if you are a good programmer, why didn’t you start Facebook”

10mm brokerage accounts opened last year alone... I have no clue where your stat came from. and now that jobs are reopening volumes are coming down. you do the correlation vs causation analysis yourself.

I don’t fully understand your idea generation so it’s hard for me to say but I bet that if you understood the Greeks and backtested your Portfolio that you would have earned more being long stock.

Its possible if you earn from a twist in the term structure. You can be short vol in one leg and long vol in another such that you are net short vol and still earn on the long vol because the term twists. Same thing can happen with a skew position. You can have vol go up but it doesn’t matter...

My favorite line from the Addams family movie (the most recent computer animated one)

Its what’s fueled the Reddit/wsb revolution. I’m not working for anyone other than my wife, kids and my future financial goals.