Search results

+1 As long as it is the ONLY tax, it is the best option hands down.

No I think they will be like.. barack obama, and Bush to a degree. Slow erosion of freedom through redistribution of wealth agenda, increased federal control over the individual in the name of public 'good'. Like health insurance mandates, NYC's ban on big softdrinks (lol), patriot act...

Guess you didn't have time to read the whole post. I'll try to make this short.. if every private citizen is armed the only way to disarm them would be to wage war, instead of conquest you would have annihilation. What would be gained? Who would support that? I would stake my life...

You don't need the same weapons. the whole point is having a means to fight back. Firearms make all men equal. Let's just say our leadership decided to get all totalitarian on us, what are they going to do? Are they gonna use military fighters and tanks to kill there own people and destroy...

I gave you an example of the private sector building infrastructure.. you didn't read it. You don't want to understand that your god and his govt are largely a drain on the rest of us, and almost everything they do can be accomplished, profitably, by the private sector. The President's...

by the way, this thread is (was) about the presidents ridiculous perspective on private business. Private companies certainly have been and will continue to be built without govt involvement. Your 'argument' was about nothing more than a single industry, and like I said the private sector could...

Dude, you are a pompous douchebag, and a fucking retard. It is impossible to arrive at that conclusion from my post(s). I have nothing against objective science (even govt funded), but I have a major problem with unsustainable and/or wasteful spending. People like you are the only real...

Where did I say I don't value basic scientific research? I'll make this real simple for you, the things you listed that have value would eventually be developed privately. Billion dollar particle smashers seem really cool and all but why do we need them? What do they provide for us? Also...

You could have competing roads/highways, and if need be, the govt could intervene through law, at no cost. They could pass a common law that as long as the people using these privately built interstate roads are paying customers they must be allowed access. For example, if the pay method were...

..why? I wasn't joking so.. do you have a reason for writing this comment?

There is no reason why private industry couldn't eventually provide all of these things. the difference is when times are tough for the citizens paying the bills ( private sector taxpayers) then R&D has to be halted on anything non essential. That of course doesn't happen when the govt is...

While we do need a federal govt, let's not say that they are the drivers of innovation or invention. While military spending has produced technological breakthroughs, infrastructure is best left to private enterprise. The railroads cited earlier are a prime example. JJ Hill's Great Northern...

So what? I was referring to Max's completely on point call on the 1st page of the thread. Instead of trying to figure out what happened and why, these dicks are trying to find evidence that the shooter is part of the tea party. lol oh and just throwing this 'possibility' out there.. ON AIR...

+ 1

Haha what a call Max. Ricter, why even bother trying to play this down?

Amazing thread title sir.

I guess I don't think that there is a 'wrong' decision for the armed man. In my opinion though, he made the better choice by shooting first and not letting it play out. Suppose they weren't silly kids but instead two hardened felons that met in the joint and compared notes? I posted another...

I was against the bailout from the beginning bud. Laissez-faire let the chips fall where they may, is the type of economy that I feel has the most productive potential. Also, it is the only economic environment that fits in a free society.. which the US is not.

+ 1 Where are Mittens ads on the GM govt takeover? now eminent domain to keep people in their houses. Are you serious, the govt can just break the law at will? How is the free market supposed to function when private investors have their deals broken illegally, by the govt! If you keep...

I wasn't calling anyone a pansy ohms, just agreeing with denner that who knows what could happen and the guy had a gun, which he choose to use. I can understand that, I get your point as well and I'm certainly not trying to act like I'm some badass. You could count the number of times i fired...