Search results

evidence? Those 1000s of letters have to be ignored obviously. There is no reason to throw common sense out the window. And where did you read that. zero-hedge :D The Judicial Committee can not afford to shift their collective brain into neutral and idle on here. Let's take a little risk...

That is an interesting idea. I completely agree, from my non-party affiliation viewpoint, it seems the GOP is risking a lot to ram this Kavanaugh nomination or any other unpopular male lackey through. It doesn't make sense to me. I would think they'll be pressuring Trump to withdraw Kav...

By December then? I think the plan would be to charge Kav in a state like Maryland with no statute of limitations. Then they can impeach him before he is seated. But all this time and expense could be avoided if he just withdrew from consideration. Maybe Trump will withdraw his nomination...

Only credible accusations count. That requires a name and some confirmation of details, the press should not report anonymous accusations until they are checked out. In his Looney Tunes Press conference today where he let everyone know he had a "huge brain", Trump claimed three women...

There is a pattern here. And the pattern continued into college. What is the likelihood that all these women, who don't know each other, are all lying? Kavanaugh is lying about not assaulting the Ford women. Conceivably he did this so regularly, that he lost track of which women he had...

That Kavanaugh is a liar. We must have Justices whose Honesty and Integrity can not be challenged. His is in tatters. I am not OK with his having sexually assaulted young women when he was a drunken young student, but were he honest and apologetic I could forgive that and let it go, because...

What I think I have learned is that fucking with elections is taken very seriously and there is apparently a lot of statutory law dealing with just such. Some of the things that you or I might think a candidate would just be fined for, and maybe get a hand slap, are felonies! I don't see...

That's where I think you may be mistaken. Certainly the attorney who suggested Trump could argue this is very likely correct. He could argue that! Trump's problem however are the tapes. It is my understanding that in at least one of those tapes that were seized in the FBI raid., and...

You've nicely reinforced my initial impression, my building skepticism, and my eventual arrival at absolute certainty that Kavanaugh is lying. It's not acting like a jerk when he was a young, it is not even his drunken sexual assaults on young women that make him unqualified to sit on the...

:rolleyes:

In fairness, let the record show that I deserve no credit for jem's amazing insight arrived at entirely on his own. to wit: that, "if true", Rosenstein's discussion of the 25th Amendment is TREASON. I do not deserve to have my name attached to this incredible revelation, and jem deserves 150%...

I am no expert on campaign finance law, but apparently it's not so cut and dried as you imply. Here is what WaPo said on 8/21/18 about the transaction My suggestion is that it would be worth your while to read this so that no one can claim you are living your life in a mushroom cave. see...

Have you ever heard that good advice: Better to be quiet and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. That would be good advice for you.

If you'll settle for "something," He (mueller) already has. Trump's co-conspirator has already plead guilty. (It is a felony charge) Trump himself will have to wait until he's out of office (Coming soon, right after the "establishment" has no more use for him) to be indicted (probably) And...

But what if he isn't. Then there are ways for Congress or the Cabinet to deal with the situation. It wouldn't be up to the Attorney general in any case, which makes this entire Rosenstein business something obviously fed to the press by someone trying to discredit, i.e., get rid of,*...

(It's coded. Only jem can read it.)

:rolleyes:Jemmy, what are we going to do with you! It is not TREASON to discuss invoking the 25th Amendment, even you can do it, and if you can do it without committing TREASON, then we can be certain Rodney can. So jemmy, all your "if trues" are for naught. There is just no way to take...

Good observation. There is no more "establishment" candidate possible than Kavanaugh. When you consider Kavanaugh's unpopularity*, and add to it the absurdity of the Senate Majority Leader, "Mr. Establishment" in the flesh, guaranteeing on National TV that Kavanaugh will be on the Court before...

I guess they would have used this same technique on all the trump appeals court nominees and on Gorsuch if they'd only thought of it, huh. It was so easy with Ford, they didn't even have to recruit her. She just wrote in asking if she could try out for the part. If it is that easy, there...

ha ha ha ...If you try to make sense of jem's posts your brain will turn to jelly. And it is incredibly dangerous to respond to them, as it will bring you perilously close to a jem black hole. If you hear a giant sicking sound -- sort of like Ross Perot heard coming from Mexico -- run like...