Search results

She is the same as the BLONDE (Susanna) She (Jenny) simply colored her hair darker. They are TWINS! :D

Exactly. As I said earlier, SAC won't even pick-up the phone unless you have $5,000,000. Insana gave investors access to a dozen or so Funds ( including ) SAC for only $500k.

The double-bottom looks to be completed now with today's move back over the last little short term high at 186. Great reaction to the bearish oil inventory news. BULLISH. Drilling sector is screaming!!! :cool:

The Kallur Twins!

Very true. Only down 61 cents now.

Cramer is a self-promoting idiot. I have no idea why people continue to mention his name in the context of an "expert". Bill Miller. He actually has a pretty successful track record over the past 15 years. His error in this instance is shocking. I'm unable to understand why he thought...

Correct.

The management fees didn't matter because Insana's "minimum" was only $500,000. He was trying to exploit a niche in the marketplace that would offer the "little-guy" an opportunity to have access to the top performing fund managers, without having to pony up the high minimums. Try getting...

Agreed. :cool:

Thanks Mup! :)

CL dropped to 115.15 on the news, then rebounded to 116.25 before peeling back off to new morning lows around 11:30AM EST. at $112.60 The funny thing is, is that the OIH is still slightly green and these stocks are so heavily shorted that they are still up nicely on the day. Any slight...

That's funny. S2007S swears by averaging down without using any stops . . . :D He and Miller must be related.

He wasn't running a hedge-fund. He was introducing capital to various funds via a "family" of funds. You don't know the difference.

For anyone that has been in the hedge-fund business, or has spent time as an "introducing" broker this article offers nothing new. Moreover, the article fails to mention what it is that Ron Insana was able to offer to the "little-guy" as opposed to the incredibly steep "minimums" that people...

Leave it to you to be so influenced by the media. How absurd.

Looks like the sector bottomed on Monday. Many chart patterns pushing weekly highs of last week. Lots of great swings in this group!

I'll take Margaret Brennan any day of the week! http://www.duno.com/Margaret_Brennan

Nat-Gas crushed down into the 7.80 handle today . . .

Care to explain why it is that you feel the above chart is described as a "bearish" pattern? It looks like a very normal and orderly consolidation that is quite typical after a big rally phase.

First off, these guys are NOT TRADERS. They are not the Stevie Cohen's of the world. No way. No how. They are portfolio managers that make INVESTMENTS based on stock selection. Don't let Ken Fisher's article on his historical perspective of bear and bull markets, how the stock indices...