Search results

  1. A

    a_person's debating style

    It's quite obvious to anyone other than complete idiots that the article was talking about the Allied armies. 1,500,000 jews fought in those armies. It was your spineless french or swiss (I presume you live in one of those two countries) ancestors who collaborated and cooperated with the Nazis...
  2. A

    a_person's debating style

    Indeed, we can agree that you wrote bullshit. Your Kaganovich became a Politburo member in 1930, therefore he could have not been a member of this body in 1928. Fair enough. There was no jewish members of the Politburo in 1928, your previous lies and fabrications notwithstanding. He is also...
  3. A

    a_person's debating style

    11,000 American Jewish soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines were killed in World War II. Overall, some 300,000 Jewish soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines died serving in the armys of the United Nations in World War II; and nearly 1,500,000 Jewish servicemen served in the armies of the United...
  4. A

    a_person's debating style

    So we can agree that this is bullshit and pure fabrication, that in 1928 there was only one jewish member (Kaganovich) in the Politburo. Can we also agree that you have no clue what you're talking about nazi-boy, that you are a disgusting Protocols regurgitating, jew-hating little hitler-jugend...
  5. A

    a_person's debating style

    The Protocols ... was now an instrument for blaming Jews for the Russian Revolution. Politburo Members 1919 to 1940. 90% (29 out of 33) are not Jews. And after 1926 the only jew in the Politburo was Kaganovich. Nazi boy, looking forward to your video blaming the Holocaust on the jews...
  6. A

    a_person's debating style

    The arabs/muslims are fucking sore losers. That's all there is to it. Whether they lose wars or debates their reaction is the same. This whole thread is hysterical though, fortunately my handlers recognize these kinds of threads as the proof of my enormous contribution to the cause of the...
  7. A

    a_person's debating style

  8. A

    a_person's debating style

    Until then The Protocols remained obscure; it was now an instrument for blaming Jews for the Russian Revolution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion Now kindly tell me how this is different from what the nazi boy Tresor is saying, including in this thread...
  9. A

    a_person's debating style

    Actually I am self-taught but I appreciate your words which I interpret as a compliment to my professional, logical, courteous and intelligent debating skills and manners. Oh and while I am at it I want to thank you for this thread, it's a huge boost to my ego to have a thread dedicated to me...
  10. A

    a_person's debating style

    Well, I am not religious. :) Besides if the LORD was familiar with millions of anonymous antisemitic postings all over the internets that have been debunked hundreds of times already, the LORD would probably reconsider what he "said unto Joshua".
  11. A

    a_person's debating style

    Oh yeah? And to "call a spade a spade" is to speak honestly and directly about a topic ...to be outspoken, blunt, even to the point of rudeness; to call things by their proper names without any “beating about the bush” Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_call_a_spade_a_spade :p :D
  12. A

    a_person's debating style

  13. A

    a_person's debating style

  14. A

    a_person's debating style

    Oh no problem at all. Tresor, I am absolutely one hundred percent sure that you have never read the Protocols and likely have never heard of them before and I am truly sorry if I ever unintentionally implied that you did. It's just too bad that you're spewing absolutely the same hateful...
  15. A

    a_person's debating style

    LOL, nice try, good luck defending your neo-nazi allies. Too bad the nazi boy keeps spewing the same lies that were published in the Protocols 150 years ago including the garbage he posted in this thread. You of all people know full well that accusing the jews of conspiracies, of controlling...
  16. A

    a_person's debating style

    Absolutely. Zionism is a secular movement to re-establish and support a jewish homeland in the Middle East. It's orthodox Judaism that does not allow the use of the internet on Shabbat. Does anyone actually have any questions left why I call them ignorant idiots. They have no idea what...
  17. A

    a_person's debating style

    The Protocols are spread by the word of mouth among jew haters, you don't need to read it, you might as well frequent anti-semitic websites and get exactly the same crap. When you accuse the jews of controlling governments, the media, finances, banks etc you're regurgitating the Protocol's...
  18. A

    a_person's debating style

    That's actually a good point, the views expressed on that site represent the views of that site's owners and no one else. It's certainly legitimate to criticize Israel and not be a "self-hating jew". In fact the whole concept of criticism is vague, some criticize Israel for being too aggressive...
  19. A

    a_person's debating style

    Irrelevant. The fact is that 9 out of 10 Politburo members were not jews, 99% of russian jews had nothing to do with communism. People believing that the jews are responsible for communism are idiots, nazis and antisemites.
  20. A

    a_person's debating style

    Oh and btw, your numbers are lying/misleading: Here is the list of Politburo Members from 1919 to 1940. http://www.cyberussr.com/rus/polit-hist.html Based on my count 4 out of 33 members were jews (same number as Georgians). Three of them were expelled in 1926. 9 out of 10 politburo...
Back
Top