Search results

2) None of those guys are starting a war or even trying to start a war. They are saying its inevitable. Ask yourself honestly why the population is being polarized.. is it because one side is really just a bunch of sore losers OR is it because our govt is becoming increasingly oppressive and...

I just pointed out how you were obviously trying to instigate, if you want to deny it, whatever. I didn't say the DHS doesn't have the 'right' to purchase ammo, I asked WHY they need it. Are they expecting a Red Dawn like scenario where paratroopers drop all over the nation? Is it just...

I'm calm bro, you're instigating by saying exactly what i was like 'don't bother saying' and then explained why.. and please stop trying to tell me what to do. It must just be like a mental deficiency in you libs.. always trying to tell others what to do.

1 & 2) The USA is not a democracy, it's a Constitutional Republic and the structure of this nation is defined by that Constitution. If abandoned or discarded, THERE IS NO USA. Elected or not, no govt official has the authority to deprive the population of their rights. and thanks for giving...

It's secession, and there is no reason for the DHS to be in an arms race with the US population. The crazies are the fucking lefty politicians who want to confiscate everyone's legally acquired guns and/or ban firearms ownership, force them to buy insurance, force them to pay higher taxes...

that's an even more douchey move. Tell a lie enough times and people start to believe it. Of course the only reason to be lying like this in the first place, is because you can't argue based on facts.

This article reeks of bullshit. lol this has to be made up or this LaPierre dude needs to get the fuck out. 100% fabricated nonsense.

Great video. That is a good guy right there with an American state of mind.

This country, much like Western Europe, is becoming eerily similar to the wannabe utopia's in 1984. I've never been to China but I have friends who are from there and they swear there is more individual freedom there than here. I have no way to verify that.. but imagine a communist country...

^ That is a bit conspiratorial imo, not that I disagree but it can't be proven. Really I'm just wondering why there is no public outrage. What happened in benghazi was literally an act of war. I know the libyan govt tried to help out during the attack but what have they done since? I realize...

it is absolutely ridiculous that this admin STILL hasn't done one fucking thing about benghazi. Yet very few Americans seem to care. Every single one of the haji's responsible should be rotting in the sand by now.

This is hopefully a joke. I'm not sure how anyone literate could be so monumentally stupid.. or why a news organization would proudly display this trash.

What is REALLY stupid, is thinking YOU know everything about trading LOL. Traders who do it for a living, and really anyone who is trading their own roll, shouldn't worry about % return. You'll find prop traders (in my experience) recording their performance in absolute terms, like cents per...

Yep they are. Populist hacks like this guy have absolutely NO principles, they're positions change with the political winds and when someone questions their motives/agenda they attack with bs allegations and smear the shit out of them. This was the same type of ridiculous response he had when...

I'm aware, but the ideas are not the same. One was a mandate made by a king, and can be taken away.. the other is a birthright which cannot.

I'm not trying to have it both ways, some of what I said is opinion and I labeled it as such. However gun control is definitely a grey-area and my opinion is based on the intent of the 2nd according to those who included it in our Constitution. Since the intent was that all civilians be armed...

I understand much of our law originates from England BUT this isn't England and whether or not the King could mandate who gets what etc.. it isn't the same here. We have an individual right to own and bear guns and it simply can't be taken away. Your last post was about Congress regulating the...

It was refuted, by 3 posters now. The 2nd was NOT included to protect slave owners from slave rebellions.

We all know that they already 'regulate' our constitutional rights, the question is: are they supposed to? I think your post is reasonable, but consider this, the police and civilian govt agencies are armed with weapons illegal for peaceable private citizens to own.. that's hypocrisy in...

Not sure about that. I'm not trying to say I think its a good idea for individuals to be armed with wmd's or anything, but where is your evidence that there were any restrictions on what individuals could or couldn't own at the time. pspr posted a good article in another thread which I just...