Search results

Evolution is a FACT

no, that is not what you clearly stated. This is what you clearly stated..... Sounds like his only strength is in your self-contradiction.

...it's bullshit.

Then we agree at least in that respect. God is no answer.

I admit I am using that statement without you understanding it.

....except that, the laws of physics allow a universe to be created out of nothing.

'God' 'Holy Spirit' .... mere tempests in a ... Teapot

So tell me, why then if that is the case, would you not regard your own preceeding statement the same way ?... Quote from DoneNDone: "... man was never able to read the mind of god accurately" "that presupposes man has an accurate definition of god, doesn't it? " Defining god as...

Lol :D Thank you Socrates. "Two things that are equally implausible are equally plausible." Now you're just making a total fool of yourself. Those "two things" are obviously and more to the point , logically, not equally implausible. You don't have a relationship expression in the...

WTF are you talking about? M Theory is about identifying membranes. Just between you and me ...How would a membrane be nothing ? Gravity has allowed WHAT? Yes you are guessing. Why don't you stop playing Einstein and use some common sense for once. Spontaneously from nothing does not...

Keep telling it to yourself. Two implausible things are plausible things - lol. It's not so much 'keep the faith' but 'keep the confusion' as far as Gods and Creators are concerned.

Your'e getting tedious with posts that are no more than insult and illogical statements. Quit with the all the childish name calling and I'll go over your illogical assertions. Otherwise you can well, ... piss off. :)

correction.... as I meant to say , ...constantly veering away from fundamental logic and common sense manifestly is the preferred method of laying claim to an implausible Creator. Ask yourself this Jem, or Res-Judicata if you are going to be inclined to start cross-dressing again...

duh As I say, verring off logic and common sense is clearly the preferred method of laying claim to an implausible Creator.

To quote what Hawking said, you quote what Carr said.. As I say, verring off logic and common sense is clearly the preferred method of laying claim to an implausible Creator.

Exactly. Constantly veering away from fundamental logic and common sense manifestly is the preferred method of laying claim to an implausible Creator.

What indications, what evidence that there may be a Creator? What design.. Since it 'appears'... but there are no scientific - no "top physicists's " - indications or evidence of any. You mean there may be intelligent design like there may be pigs that fly? As the laws of physics...

As most of your outburst is just brainless ranting and abuse, the little which you seem to be trying to defend is some kind of argument that centers around your understanding of what dark matter and dark energy is.... But I have said FOUR times now , you don't have to accept or understand...

Ranting and childish name calling really doesn't help you sound like you have a clue. "...current thinking is that 96% of the universe is dark matter and dark energy." ..so what's your problem? You said it. I hope you realize for your own sake, that would leave 4% of the universe...