Search results

No kiddin'.:p

Yes you can say that. He said the actor was chance, and chance alone did it all.

You imagine the existentialism which is people being free to be responsible for what they make of themselves is looking into an abyss? Maybe you could use some deconstruction right there to appreciate what it is you are actually suggesting.

Design is not intelligent design. That obviously doesn't matter to you. Of course there is proof of design. Ignoring all the proven evidence that design isn't and needs not be intelligent, is obviously what matters to you.

As a self-contradicting concept of infinite regress, evidence of random ignorant chance would be intelligent design. Whereas evolution is hard and factual evidence of the substantial reduction of random chance by natural selection. Whilst I respectfully acknowledge your polite...

Well just maybe that's the thing when you lock in deep seated preconceptions of how things must be. Since when did constructive criticism become a bad thing? Deconstruction leading to "the death of God" could be one positive outcome. Those "stupid" animals don't worship deities and it seems...

Do you get this muddled tying shoe laces? It matters not one jot where life may have started, De Duve knows it didn't start with intelligent design. He said so. Categorically. You might stop trying to dodge that crucial fact all the time. Perhaps bring a little honesty into your life.

Then you use the term ID and non ID incorrectly (and irrationally). You use the term Creationism incorrectly. Evolution is a scientific fact. There is no ID in it. Perhaps you oppose teaching science in school.

You're trying to evade again. You used a specific quote of de Duve's which posed his own scenario requiring an answer . You used it to prop up a false argument for intelligent design or at least the possibility of it. The next quote from de Duve quashed any prospect of intelligent...

In the removing of what you call blind ignorant chance, you have natural selection and evolution. Take away your intelligent design creator and you have common sense. Infinite regress is no explanation. Of course natural selection is proven. Every change could not as easily be by ID...

Then you are simply making an argument on a false premise. Evolution is not an assumption of blind ignorant chance. That is your rather uninformed assumption of Evolution. Evolution by natural selection is the govenor of chance. Without it, blind ignorant chance could not produce the...

..taken from "Judaism Online" website. Did you ever think to expect a strong religious skew? You take a quote from a website purposely promoting religion. You cut & paste a de Duve quote which is obviously only part of something, as it is in the form of a rhetorical question, then you accuse...

Thank you most kindly kts. I can't help realizing when conversing with the blind in faith, how science is all about standing on the shoulders of giants, whilst religion intelligent design creationism, is basically to do dumbing everything down so to grovel at the feet of an imaginary one.

Stop tying to change the subject. Your claims about de Deuv are false. Trying confuse and contradict yourself with even more dishonest argument doesn’t alter any of that that.

Evolution. Fact.

So I make the sentence once ever and you repeat it six times in one post. That means by your faith and belief styled logic system, it's me with a finger on the repeat button. You've sent that critical thinking and rigorous examining of issues logically straight out the window already. The...

I already gave you the source, it makes no difference to you it is in his book, nor when someone makes a video and speaks the words themself. Like Susskind , you just deny people say what do. The quote you intended to misrepresent de Deuv with is a rhetorical question of his. The quote...

Well that certainly flipped your switch. Steady there or you'll do yourself an injury. Evolution is proven, has proved itself, and continuously does so, however much you refuse to accept the fact. You'll never be able to change that. Intelligent design creationism, just like flat earth...

Your responses contain the same intellectual content as a Flat Earther's. If blind ignorant chance was all evolution has to work with, it's certainly done a far better job of proving itself , than random blind ignorant faith ever has for the creationists’ intelligent design. Evolution ...

..and intelligent design is to refuse, refuse, REFUSE the fact.....