Search results

.....dream on.

And what you call 'critiques of abiogenesis' are no such thing. They are willfully ignorant remarks made by ID creationists. "The whole notion of abiogenesis is a construction built by evolutionists so that they can dismiss the whole notion of God from the generation of life." So if it...

I address them , you ignore them, just so you can say I refuse to address them. That's what creationists do.

Obviously it wasn't "nice" as you kept up the unreasoned peevish whinges regardlessly. Godunnit is no argument and when you think like Glen Beck, rebuttal would seem like blather.

You did use racial slurs You could have used w-t-y, c-r-k-ah, and p-n-ky like you did use n-igger. You think it's ok to use racial slurs against whites and not blacks? Your own double standards might need fixing first before you start blaming others or society at large.

Confirming once more that it is not reasoned argument but peevish whinges, uniformed conclusions, willfull ignorance, denial and misinformation at the core of intelligent design creationism.....

...no kidding. Well done ...dumb then dumber and then dumber again.

The frustrated Creationists' pitfall, And the Intelligent Designers' downfall, Is that they try and they try, But can't reason why, Science should make sense of the real world at all.

Asking simplistic uninformed questions with false question-begging presuppositions in them, and then answering them yourself , is dumb Repeatedly doing so is even dumber.

I am suggesting , if you want one standard you could start by acting and possibly thinking like you do want one standard for goodness sake. My suggestion is first, stop behaving in the way you say is PC orthodoxy and a double standard society. You can type nigger. You don't have to type...

Face it Jem, you are out of your depth. So muddled up you're appearing to no longer even understand what it is you are arguing about." The answer of modern molecular biology to this much-debated question is categorical: chance, and chance alone, did it all, from primeval soup to man, with only...

You are not making anything simple nor are you connecting dots, you are merely scribbling all over the page with a big fat thick headed marker pen. Asking simplistic uninformed questions with false, question-begging presuppositions and then answering them yourself , is well, just plain dumb...

I see what you are saying to a point but... You could have typed the word nigger , you chose not to. You did choose to write crackah, whitey, and pinky. So why would you want or expect social standards and PC orthodoxy not to do the equivalent? Isn't it yourself who is accepting PC as being...

Ok, I take your point, but then you were trying to support the idea both sides were involved with "emotionalism", which was something only being used as a misleading diversion by a creationist supporting creationism.

Which is why I suggested you are making emotionalism the argument, just like ZZZ and Jem tried to. It isn't the argument. It's a red herring. A fallacious issue thrown to divert. You’ve done the same, but on far less egregious grounds. I’m guessing its mainly because of a built in...

A little parable maybe. The kiddies are all playing in the schoolyard. Two opposing teams. They are all, of course, "emotionally involved". One apparently letting emotion get the better of them, goes over to the opposite team, smacks someone in the eye and shouts "you have...

Well, I can go over it again if you like... but look, you just said "I see no point in arguing with everyone about emotion" So why did you jump in anyway!?

You might as well say everyone has an emotional attachment to every debate they are ever involved in. But usually people don't go around appearing emotional, then point a finger to say everyone else is being emotional who doesn't agree with their ideas. Now you are just essentially making...

I think those would be your own personal double social standards.

Do you think there is good reason why you apparently didn't think it necessary to write w-t-y, c-r-k-ah, and p-n-ky but did have to write n-g-er ?