Search results

Like one does with Santa, Zeus and the Speghetti Monster.

That example is a proof of an impossibility, not proof of a negative (evidence of absence) logical fallacy. Can YOU imagine your own ignorance?

Talking to yourself is an early sign... Sicking up the same cut & pastes time and time again even though they have already been refuted over and over is another sign... Not giving a damn to understand anything said to you is another sign... Since when in your limited worldview has the...

Why not!? You won the lottery of life against infinitesimal odds, gained consciousness when uncountable numbers of others did not but who just as well could have done in your place. You get the chance to dodge a bullet, avoid heart attacks, or not, as the case may be. You won the chance! You...

What you call papers from MIT was a flawed philosophical argument in which the opening premise didn't even stand up. What you call quotes from multiple Nobel (not noble!) prize winners were either misrepresentations or partial quotes meant to purposely give a wrong impression. What you call...

duh. Science says no such thing. Science is observing a fundamental constant having different values across the universe. So logic says your irrational creationist idea that so called fine tuning needs a tuner , only for the reason that you want one merely for a bunch of weird personal...

woo.. that's really witty of you.:p Never mind Jem look at it this way, you've been just another unfortunate insect of creationism devoured in the fly trap of reason. :D

Well there you are then. As apparently it does now appear one constant at least has different values across the universe, there in a stroke goes your creationist "fine tuning" argument, as if it ever was an argument in the first place. So what's your problem now? Ooo.. I know, no need...

That is by any standard a definition of self-serving and self-interest. You expect to get something back. Nothing more than an investment gamble to satisfy your own selfish philosophical outlook. So as a church, as a christian, you anticipate 100x reward, and grant yourself a hope of heaven...

There is no mention of "many parts". What are you talking about!? A particular constant, the electromagnetic force, appears to have larger values looking further away , whilst in a different direction, the constant has lower values at far off distances. So you are wrong in principle at...

Seeing you ask, I'd rather take my chance with a guy who based his actions on faith and charity irrespective of what he believed or did nor believe. When it comes down to generalizations that inform the entire group, I 'd rather trust people individually who instinctively know right from...

Do you think saying troll all the time somehow means you must be right or something? Just because you want everything to be a certain way so you think they add some support to your own fantasies, does not make them so. The only reference to infinite other areas of space is the one you've...

Jem fat troll...no it isn't science however much you wish it was by reposting it. You should get a room with TraderTroll to compare the sameness in both of your dead in the water methods of non-argument.

That'll be what you wish anyone can see. What can actually be seen is that you can’t properly discuss a point, so it's a case of just keep regurgitating links to the same old nonsense you've already come out with. Pathetic.

by the way a bible freak commenting on what he thinks Penrose is merely suggesting ...is not science... you big fat troll.:p Let's try that again sparky... One of those top Nobel prize winning scientists you always like to mention and then completely misrepresent in the name of Creator...

This from the bewildered half-wit who seems to imagine repeatedly linking to his previous brain farts will somehow fix them.

Hansel touched upon the problem with your approach, although I think it's more dodgy than you appear to realize, starting out with your initial decision sounding as if they are made through faulty reasoning based on a prejudice and simplistic pre-conclusions. The choice really is a guy who...

You are expecting the "Christ imitator" to imitate what? Christ or Goodness itself? Fundamentally those are two separate and distinct concepts anyway. Simply based on the math then, why would you expect to feel ok with someone who tells you he is genuine in relying on an imaginary friend...

Christianity, premised and grounded upon specific concepts of fundamental inhuman wrongdoings, but professing to be nothing but good, is changing into what? Something better? Perhaps changing into things which have always been available in their own right anyway, without delusional beliefs...