Search results

Wrong order. "The plaintiff's lawyer's screwed up." The plaintiff and their lawyer don't have a valid claim and they screwed up. "Obama produced no evidence." No evidence required. Fatuous and baseless birther accusations which have already screwed up time after time inside and outside...

And I wouldn't expect anything but an emotional and slightly hysterical response from you in reply. For someone who didn't want to open up a can of worms over interpretation of constitutional intent, you sure give the contrary impression. Do you really want to swap statements made by the...

In a civilized and civil democratic society, any strongly held personal beliefs are tempered by the rule of law. The Constitution wisely intended exactly that by using words which separate the vigor of peoples' many versions of true religious belief away from government. In doing so it...

"This Decision is entirely based on the law, as well as the evidence and legal arguments presented at the hearing." MICHAEL M. MALIHI, Judge ...but you still got birther gripes it seems.

Why did something happen? Do you imagine the looney birther brigade learnt anything even after another of their so many silly suits just fell flat on its farcical face? Birther Jem learned how to spell cite, but I doubt he or Oily T learnt much about the law or what constitutes a valid...

You seem to be one of those who think that anything they say must be always be correct. What ARE you trying to argue? Do you even know? I've already said anyone can question a candidates eligibility. That is the law as it stands and is how the law is applied. People are perfectly free, as...

Meaningless drivvle AND you quote Oily Taitz. Much doesn't come more foolish than that. Still I must remember, you are a birther. It comes with the territory.

yes, you really do need to stop doing that.

Birthers don't even have a challenge. All they do have is an invalid hysterical claim , perpetuated mainly for various very sad political purposes.

"He is a bottomless cup of daft." LoL. You're quite right of course.....

You've managed to produce one single civil response. Apparently all it required was that you didn't say anything in it.

Why don't you read it and then go f'ck yourself?

Read my last sentence in my previous post to you. Then go read Georgia Code. Idiot.

You said I was lying whether Obama needs to "proffer evidence" Completely untrue and unfounded. You then seemed to imagine I said Lawyers in front of "ALJ judges" or the judges themselves do not have the power to issue "subpoena's" Completely untrue and unfounded. I said no such thing...

Briefs are to be submitted by Feb 1 to the Judge. You should hear by or before Feb 5 the court finds the birther claims have zero credibility.

What question Jemoloon. Do you even have a legitimate question in you?

What is really wrong with you , apart from being an birthoramous? The only person lying here - is you to yourself. No court has found any challenge legitimate. There is no order or requirement from any court for Obama to provide evidence of eligibility any more than there is for any other...

wtf seriously, are you being serious ? I said, before evidence can be given in reply to a challenge, you need a valid challenge . Birthers don't have one. Who said either lawyers or Judge Malihi does not have power to issue subpoenas. What the hell are you talking about? What the...

Teaching creationism alongside evolution is teaching Harry Potter alongside math. It is the scientific method itself which opens up questions and enquiry and critical thinking. 'Lamarckism' is an evolutionary theory. Comparing Lamarck with Darwin is interesting in as much as biology is...