Search results

so, you agree with the EXISTING law as it stands? FULL auto should be unavailable to all law abiders and law breakers alike? since you are a "law abider" and "up standing" citizen you MUST agree with the law, right?

Firearm laws just don't come into existence out of nowhere. Someone must decide what should be banned and WHO should be excluded from ownership. Your LOCAL laws are made by YOU and people like you. And here you are wanting the laxest interpretation of gun ownership allowed by law but you don't...

So, you think bazookas for sale in WalMart are a great idea too LOL :D i hope you are kidding, for god sakes i hope :eek:

That's interesting that you WEIGHT all criminal activity the same...but what evidence (as you asked of me) do you have to show that those convicted of minor infractions (that involve NO violence, eg local firecracker law)) should have their rights stripped for life from owning anything that...

what evidence do you have that a widespread ban on the bazooka or handheld SAM reduce crime?

So, if you were busted for unlawfully setting off fireworks, for instance, you shouldn't own a weapon?

Ok, those that have never committed a crime get access to "own whatever I want to shoot" ..great obviously we need to define what a "criminal" is because YOU have singled this group out. What is a criminal?

like your wife i'm still waiting for you to satisfy--------------------> me :D

Yes, we have the right to bear arms. But which arms? At some point you must make the hard decision as what that "right to bear arms" means? I'm willing ti listen to reason, but I haven't heard any yet :D so far nothing but a lot of cliches and machismo :D

even you must admit you don't need that rifle. it's a play toy for you maybe you might have to give up some your toys for the greater good? i'm sure you'll find others :D

never had a problem with it. what i would like though is "next" (and "previous") page button. with the current color scheme hard for me to see at a glnace what page I'm on

why do you need that kind of fire-power :p

how many rounds per minute does that fire?

I am NOT anti-gun but I think we need to take a hard look at phasing some of this stuff out that serves no use but may be excessively deadly in the wrong hands. that's all I'm saying, and semi-auto RIFLES fall into this category. (as do full auto)

:p

You still have not answered the very basic question of why you NEED a semi-auto rifle?

Nope. And neither would I :D ps science rarely changes its mind but tweaks constantly

How stupid is this statement? LOL "I don't care what it is I'm against it!" F^ck that's dumb thing to say Your a freaking caveman :D

No, give me facts but explain those facts especially when they seem at odds with reason. why would MORE use result in LESS injury??

ok. despite the fact that we all know that broad statistics can be fraught with error and misinterpretation let's assume for the moment your stats reflect some truth... How do you explain it? More use leads to less rate of death or injury?