Search results

  1. R

    Own Marketsurfer's Personal Phone

    Yes, but that is what you do and what you do is not common here; hence your phone isn't likely to garner one bit of interest. Make sense?
  2. R

    Own Marketsurfer's Personal Phone

    Neither am I. This is a TRADING site. LOL
  3. R

    Own Marketsurfer's Personal Phone

    So Rod, are going to buy "his" phone? Surely such a deal isn't something you can pass up.
  4. R

    Own Marketsurfer's Personal Phone

    The silliest gadget that was ever listed for sale here at ET?
  5. R

    Own Marketsurfer's Personal Phone

    I hear what you are saying regarding a watch holding its value and, if you can find a buyer at the end, you essentially could have owned the watch for very little in the meantime. But there is a big difference between taking yourself out to 5 napkin burger a few times a month and making the...
  6. R

    Own Marketsurfer's Personal Phone

    Then why not buy a cheap watch from Wal-Mart (or similar store) and use the money saved on other, more important, things? :confused:
  7. R

    Own Marketsurfer's Personal Phone

    Really? You can't just carry one phone, you need two?
  8. R

    Own Marketsurfer's Personal Phone

    But there is something to be said about finding happiness in things other than gadgets and cars and yachts etc etc. If you need to latest toy to feel like you have self worth, then something is missing in your life.
  9. R

    Own Marketsurfer's Personal Phone

    On the contrary! I'm actually very happy overall, believe it or not I enjoy spirited debate. Plus I used an "LOL".....are you too old to know what that means ;)
  10. R

    Own Marketsurfer's Personal Phone

    Did it sound like he was interested? LOL
  11. R

    hmm.no edges in the markets

    Now think about this....if the below is true for something as simple as a 200 day MA, imagine what the results might be on a more complex combination of inputs. If what you posted below is true, you are essentially admitting that there is value in TA. If something so simple can actually...
  12. R

    hmm.no edges in the markets

    You're a few steps ahead of me then :)
  13. R

    hmm.no edges in the markets

    Not subjective at all. All the rules are objective, I'm just the one trading it. When I say "meeting the minimum requirements" I mean the objective system requirements
  14. R

    hmm.no edges in the markets

    Good point but some models have liquidity limitations and these are traded rather than given out for free.
  15. R

    hmm.no edges in the markets

    The only live trades I would ever even consider posting are ones that the system generate that do not meet the minimum requirements for a trade otherwise that's essentially giving away my exact system. Problem is, many setups DO just meet the minimum requirements and I know I would be accused of...
  16. R

    hmm.no edges in the markets

    To expand on this, if studies are being done and value is discovered, it would be TRADED and not WRITTEN about.
  17. R

    hmm.no edges in the markets

    For the 500th time... you are wrong.
  18. R

    hmm.no edges in the markets

    You want my exact rule set? That would give you an answer but why would I do that? :confused:
  19. R

    hmm.no edges in the markets

    Regardless of who is doing the actual trading, the system is still derived from market generated statistics.
  20. R

    hmm.no edges in the markets

    TA can be either subjective or objective so long as the trader or algo is "analyzing statistics generated by market activity" to make trading decisions. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/technicalanalysis.asp If ones inputs into an algo are based on statistics created by the markets...
Back
Top