Search results

ha ha ha. The definition is left entirely up to Congress.

You might be able to help bring this Mueller thing to a speedy conclusion. Just go to this sight and sign the petition. :D www.needtoimpeach.com

It is way more than 10% in my view. Because as I said previously the U.S. is a fine place to live if you are economically in the upper ten percent or if you are healthy. You may not have read my entire remark. Access to routine Healthcare in the U.S. is not a right. Here, access to...

It's fine for me. I'm in the 10% , but I have wide ranging interests and I travel fairly widely. There are many countries I would be pleased to live in. My philosophy is that if you like where you've been, you'll like where you're going.

I have no problem with a preliminary review that raises questions. Then depending on the answers, one can make a decision whether further investigation is warranted. So far there seems to be nothing other than standard practice. If you are wealthy, you contribute to causes your friends support...

I agree that this past haunts them, nevertheless it appears to me that the red tape involved in doing business there both internally and externally is related to the very high degree of democracy involved in decision making.

You are welcome to ask. But doing so does not reflect well on you.

You can't make her. But you can try. :D

So far, It does conform.

Based on what I have learned about these investigations, that is a risky assumption. Watergate took two years for example.

India is the most democratic large nation. It is a mess.

But who will you hire to clean up after you then.

Did you graduate from college? Did you study liberal arts? Do you travel much?

"special investigations " cost tax payer money. Let's not do them unless a preliminary investigation shows there is sufficient evidence to warrant expenditure of additional time and money. Let's make sure we aren't wasting everyone's time and money for purely political reasons..

re·pub·lic rəˈpəblik/ noun noun: republic; plural noun: republics a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch. archaic a group with a certain equality between its members. There...

I have wrestled with the same question in regards to investment portfolios, particularly those designed to fund retirement. I can only say that you do not want to mimic mutual or index funds. (Why would anyone managing their own account do that?) If you don't have the time or knowledge to...

I don't agree. You've confused solar radiance. which can't account for temperature changes, with Shaviv's hypothesis, as did the blogger you gave a link to. I'm not going to do it for you, because I can't. But if you take the time to look into Shaviv's work you will find that he has shown...

way too simplistic! But charmingly child like, nevertheless. Really Cute!

You've nicely identified the real problem. It is not the science, it is the politicizing of the science. Science has nothing to do with politics, so identifying a scientific hypothesis like Hansen's with left or right politics is nuts. Why do you suppose this AGW issue had it's name changed...

Only if you equate "climate change" with Hansen's hypothesis. No one is anti climate change unless they are insane. People have completely lost sight of the crucial issue, which is whether man's contribution to atmospheric CO2 is going to result in a catastrophic increase in the Earth's...