Search results

  1. P

    Cut the Crap About Red States Subsidizing Blue States

    I didn't know you favored higher taxes on the wealthy or lower taxes on labor or both, but it's a position I can't argue with.:D
  2. P

    Maybe this Colin Kaepernick has a point?

    Is there only the quarterback? I thought there were ten other guys on a team. I don't think hockey players are kneeling. Why not just stick with hockey?
  3. P

    Global Warming: For Experts Only

    I just now realized I made a minor error in my post above. I implied that the the greenhouse mechanism was the only mechanism by which CO2 affected Earths surface temperature. Carbon dioxide, according to NASA, is net cooling in the outer atmosphere by a different mechanism. "Global...
  4. P

    Global Warming: For Experts Only

    Technically, it is the amount of global temperature rise as a function of atmospheric CO2 concentration; not the green house effect per se, which is a photophysical phenomenon with no specific number attached to it. . Remember water is the most important green house gas, but water, unlike CO2...
  5. P

    Dynamic Yield Curve

    Thanks for posting that nice chart mr. stocktrader. It is like what I would expect, more or less, but nice to see it charted out. It reminds me of what I should be paying attention to. Tomorrow is Thanksgiving, my personal favorite, of all holidays. Translated, that means that among all...
  6. P

    Global Warming: For Experts Only

    I just want to comment that in my post above, unless i mention a specific mechanism, when I refer to positive or negative feedback I am referring to the net of all individual feedback mechanisms. There are of course many individual phenomena, both positive and negative, that have been...
  7. P

    Global Warming: For Experts Only

    Where on Earth did you get that idea? You must have read related threads I've contributed to? Even Hansen unwittingly has shown this to be the case if the feedback is negative, not positive. Positive feedback is a requirement to show a significant effect of rising CO2. (At the projected...
  8. P

    This is the next person going down for sexual assault mark my words you heard it here first.

    The lines between sexual assault, sexual harassment, disgusting behavior, very bad behavior, and plain old bad behavior seems to be blurring. Once we start criminalizing plain old bad behavior we are all going down. :D
  9. P

    Global Warming: For Experts Only

    This is appearing to be less and less likely as more studies appear. Go to 4:13 in the Nir Shaviv youtube video I posted a link to for a nice summary of IPCC problems. It isn't that anthropomorphic contributions aren't present. They are, and they are insignificant. Anything the IPCC doesn't...
  10. P

    Global Warming: For Experts Only

    I just wanted to comment that I am somewhat familiar with the Laken, et al. paper you cited. In this paper Shaviv's 2005 paper is cited without much comment. I think the Laken paper contains at least one serious error, Fig. 5, in that it is using GCR uncorrected for energy. Only Cosmic rays...
  11. P

    Global Warming: For Experts Only

    What exactly is your point? I thought it was that observed temperature change can not be explained by direct solar radiative forcing. I don't disagree with this, and neither does Shaviv!. You have failed utterly to even try and understand Shaviv's contribution to the science. It is not...
  12. P

    Global Warming: For Experts Only

    Here are Shaviv's numbers for you. What you are persistently referring to is solar luminosity that has been thoroughly investigated and its effect on temp change is weak which is referred to in the literature as solar radiative forcing. If you read below you will see that according to Shaviv...
  13. P

    Global Warming: For Experts Only

    Stu, I have respect for you but I don't have infinite patience. Statement such as this that you have posted do not reflect well on the knowledge you bring to these forums. "...and don't publish as thousands of other scientists have" See below. As a scientist I don't mind informing you that...
  14. P

    Global Warming: For Experts Only

    Again your confusing conventional studies of solar radiance with shaviv's work. You'll have to read his papers, or at the very minimum watch his entire youtube presentation, and pay attention, to see that his hypothesis is entirely different from what you apparently think it has to do with...
  15. P

    Tax Bill Would Slam Families Earning Less Than $75K

    “If it’s enacted, the GOP tax cut now working its way through Congress will be the start of a decades-long economic policy disaster unlike any other that has occurred in American history.” “There’s no economic justification whatsoever for a tax cut at this time. U.S. GDP is growing...
  16. P

    HILLARY

    Could you be reliving last years spectacular?, whereas the current Rodeo has Democrats relegated to the peanut gallery and it's Republicans roping the steers and riding the bulls.
  17. P

    HILLARY

    Although the current tactic of blaming immigrants, Isis, and "crooked Hillary," has been effective just as intended, the possibility of the Labor class eventually waking up and deciding they are not going to take it anymore hangs heavy over Republican party heads. The best thing to do is to...
  18. P

    HILLARY

    I don't think the Democrats what to get rid of Trump until Jan 2021. He is the "Republican" of their dreams! and the President from Hell for the Republicans. As long as Trump doesn't start a nuclear war this is going to turn out to be one hell of a hilarious chapter in future history texts.
  19. P

    HILLARY

    Wait a minute now. Calling Rubio "little Marco". That's surely a misdemeanor, and calling for Mitch to step down, now there's a crime! One misdemeanor, one crime, that's all you need!:D
Back
Top