Search results

Where can I see these affidavits? I didn't realize any of that had been made available to the public yet. You make it sound as though there are affidavits from other than Ford, Judge and Kavanaugh stating; "the events described by Ford involving Kavanaugh never happened with them as...

There are only three witnesses to the alleged attack. One says it did not happen under oath. One said it did under oath .And the third said something. it is unclear what exactly, perhaps it was that he doesn't recall the incident, or that he did not witness such an incident, or words to that...

There are only three people that could make such an affidavit that wouldn't be based on hearsay. Those would be Kavanaugh, Ford and Judge. I don't believe sworn affidavits from any of these three, that say what you claim they say, exist. Any other affidavit asserting "that Brett Kavanaugh...

I think this is incorrect. I believe Judge supplied a letter from his attorney, not signed by judge, and a later letter that Grassley read today signed by Judge, but not a sworn affidavit. I'll be happy to stand corrected if this is wrong, but this is my understanding at present. I don't...

The problem isn't this. The problem is that Kavanaugh lied about this! None of them said they were not at the party, excepting Kavanaugh. One of those others said they do not recall the party, they other said something quite different. Kavanagh also lied several more times during his...

Collegiality in our government bodies is essential to their proper functioning. McConnell is doing for collegiality in the Senate what Gingrich did for collegiality in the House. These two men will leave an unfortunate legacy. The ends do not justify the means.

It was a performance for sure by Graham. He wants to Trump Sessions, so to speak, when Trump appoints him as Jeff's replacement. Hence all the sucking up and the golf. Kavanaugh gave a little hint of his normally suppressed innate aggressiveness. Could not refute credibly any of Ford's...

It is a shame what has happened to this country. We will know very soon whether there is any reason for optimism.

Though I wouldn't normally like to see a case 36 years old be prosecuted, I'll make an exception for a liar like Kavanaugh. Suppose the DA convenes a grand jury and subpoenas Supreme Court Justice B.K. and Ford to testify. Then there is a jury trial. If that were to happen, I wouldn't want to...

Just hang'n, drink'in, etc.

You beat me to it! I was composing my post above when you posted.

On Fire? As in Liar, Liar, Pants of Fire? Sorry that just popped into my head when I saw the thread title. B.K. left a lot of gaps in his testimony that could be cleared up with a week of FBI field work. I don't think we will get that. We will know more when we see if the vote in the full...

That's right. The the kind of fact finding the FBI carries out as a service in the case of high level appointments is quite different from a criminal investigation. In vetting candidates for the Court, they are interested more in turning up the kind of thing that might prove an embarrassment to...

You didn't really read that article did you. Had you you'd have noticed why the kind of vetting Supreme Court Justices are subjected to will not turn up anything negative when the candidate is a liar, like Kavanaugh!. H ha ha. We all know that Trump would never select someone who an...

The FBI carry's out thousands of routine clearances each year. The depth of investigation is shallower for routine clearances. In clearing middle age candidates the FBI would not be expected to spend a lot of time interviewing people from the candidates distant past. I have had clearances...

It is bizarre. If the FBI gets involved be prepared for stepped up attacks on the FBI's credibility.

I would think her being a "slut", if she is, I have no idea, would make her rather an expert on these particular parties. Do to her expertise and experience, she was obviously no one-time casual observer, I would rate here impression of the parties as highly reliable. I'm disappointed in you too.

You may have confused two different things here. It is of only passing interest whether Switzer liked the parties -- she apparently liked them. But it is of great relevance to the Kavanaugh investigation what went on at those parties and who the usual attendees were if they included Kavanaugh...

BRAVO! BRAVISIMO! And three Cheers for Swisher!

PATTERN! and the pattern it has been backed up by others who knew him. Watch the hearing tomorrow if you can, assuming it goes off as planned. There may be a last minute rescheduling. Lots of new developments it seems.