Search results

  1. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    .......like I said, any silly or ignorantly simplistic statement a creationist cares to make...
  2. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    So any silly or ignorantly simplistic statement you care to make, for instance about elementary particles, means Evolution isn't a fact and science is equal to any other daft idea like Creators and intelligent design? As if you have any kind of an argument.
  3. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    You have been caught red handed peddling lies, misinformation and untruths. You ignore all that and can only shout troll. Another example of a creationist's so called logic and dishonesty rolled into one. ================ Yeah, great points Jem:cool:
  4. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    Problem is, what you say is factually incorrect. It appears rather strange if not weird to be denying fact as a way of trying to bring credibility to unsupported belief. As if you could make the idea of intelligent design become true or possible because somewhere science does not prove...
  5. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    Congratulations on another in a long line of unintelligent responses.
  6. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    By the standards you describe the Theory of Gravity along with the Theory of Evolution are both unsuitable to teach in public school. Both scientific Theories are proven, prognostications by both predict outcome, yet it appears crucial to the creationist that both Gravity and Evolution are...
  7. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    It would make no difference to those, possibly like yourself, to whom a fact is not a fact, whenever religious belief is taking precedence to pretty much everything else. If you really don't know why Evolution is a fact by now, there is a world of Google out there to help you understand.
  8. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    So your ever drifting argument is science does wonderful things and proves stuff , but because it doesn't prove everything , therefore anything might be true? Especially completely non scientific wildly unsupported imaginations around an idea that an invisible God Goblin caused everything...
  9. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    QM is unequivocally proven on many levels. Intelligent design creationism on non, not even making it to the level of reasonable. I really don't think you need to be Einstein to realize or appreciate that observation or experience of the infinitesimally small atomic or particle QM scale...
  10. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    Evolution is a fact. Depending on YOUR definition, even a fact isn't a fact.
  11. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    Of course your argument will always lead back to the same place. A place of infinite question begging that explains nothing at all. You have Evolution needing a cause, the environment needing a cause, everything needing a cause, some unknown cause needing a cause. Whereas evolving...
  12. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    Change by environment has a cause. The cause is, by that statement obviously, the environment. Nothing miraculous about change .
  13. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    I'm responding to others using the word change. Try to keep up.
  14. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    Change by environment has a cause, the environment, and therefore doesn’t require or necessitate change by any other design.
  15. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    Unexplained fine tunings are evidence of unexplained fine tunings. A fine tuner, for what are questionably fine tunings anyway, is a leap of blind faith.
  16. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    Fine tuning is not a scientific theory. Certain components of it may be compatible with known scientific facts but that does not make fine tuning / the anthropic principle - a scientific theory. On the other hand Evolution is a fact. A proven fact, scientific fact and scientific theory...
  17. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    …..that'll be why you are always banging the table? The "favorite professor" might have been better teaching you how to spell essential legal words properly and suggesting you go find the facts when you haven't any. Problem is you can't deal with the responses so you just repost the same...
  18. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    I bet you so wish just one word of that were true. Unless of course you are completely delusional and actually believe it is.
  19. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    Not so. Religion if anything is a strong belief in a supernatural power, usually, generally and pretty much always called God, which is supposed to control human destiny. Religion is of course also an institution to express belief in a divine power. No wonder Christopher Hitchen's has an...
  20. S

    Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

    My request was that you don't agree with me. So you are going to? I rue the day. You've not made anything look easy by your "call to duty" . Absurd, yes.
Back
Top