Search results

There's no reason for me to to argue with Szostak. That's what you're doing. Szostak:There are parts of a pathway that I think are getting to be well understood, but there are many gaps in our understanding. But just because there are parts that we don't understand doesn't mean that we...

Of course there is evidence and there are plausible pathways for life from non life. There is evidence and there are plausible pathways for getting to Mars. It's the specifics of the process which are incomplete, not plausibility, or a problem of no evidence. The infantile approach you have...

How? Gravity. Where? Universe , obviously. Inevitability is good reason for it. Imaginary beardy magic man, isn't.

No not really.... http://web.mit.edu/rog/www/papers/does_origins.pdf The common view is that given a fuller understanding of the physical and biological conditions and processes involved, the emergence of life should be seen to be quite likely, or at least not very surprising.

Sure. They'll ignore facts and use irrationality as a form of argument. True signs of the conspiracy theorist, from birthers to moon landing spoonbrains. Although it does seem, jem is simply, not so much a conspiracist, but from the crap he writes, just simple, in the head. These idiots will...

There is nothing obvious in what you are saying as you state there is. You started out with a contradiction and have now added a bunch of faulty assumptions to it. Earlier you had a problem with contradiction. That is except it seems, when you make one. At total entropy. What exactly is...

Oh come on! What constraint of language! How about using the words "divine creator" or "God" or if you want to be obscure, "something". Point is you are making the contradiction. Speaking generally, as every being or thing whatever it may be, does appear to be in some form of decay, a...

I was thinking about the arrow of time that stops and starts. Not reversal of entropy. You were talking of contradiction. Thinking about someone (someone!!? - seriously??) outside of this universe........that would be a contradiction. My suggestion is that the spontaneous creation of a cyclic...

I've noticed Ricter will usually throw down a philosophical banana skin at an early stage to slip his way around on .

There you go again. Off into infantile insult troll mode once again. Did you not read earlier where Free Thinker referred to PRATT? You're regurgitating the same tired old stuff already refuted without paying any attention to the refutations against the claims you make. Trying to use...

Ah right , so the various cosmological models of a cyclical universe from Albert Einstein, to Roger Penrose are of "little or no evidence". You like to say you "point to Science and Nobel prize winners who explain what their scientific finds are"..... except when you don't like what they say...

Not obvious, not really. Why would eternal + decay (ie: gradual decrease/death/whatever) be a contradiction? As a catholic you do resurrection don't you? :) An actual universe that evolves from low entropy to high to low .... a cyclic universe expanding and contracting indefinitely, isn't...

So much for your promise of "modified ignore" Jem, you are hanging onto an argument about de facto default, that is to say, default irrespective of lawful authority. Quoting the letter of the law as if definition will simplistically apply under all circumstances is a mistake. An...

Fair enough, a question portraying broad ignorance wider than bandwidth itself. Great job.

woo.... now I'm on "modified ignore" your troll bs is so succinct. Quick summary it is then.:p Birthers file suit. Court requires response. Response made in the form of a motion to quash. Refused by the court. Jem-o-loon sings D.E.F.A.U.L.T. to the tune of Tammy Wynette. Judge Malihi...

Then you must prefer a much broader brand of ignorance.

Away with those damnable usurper birthers it is then.

Would you really do that for me jem? Put me on modified ignore, whatever the hell that is. Thanks in advance. Everyone's an ass that doesn't go for the bullshit you blurt out. But let's hope your "work is busy" more than your rationality around here has ever been. Links or proof...

Birthers filed suit. Response is required. Response comes in the form of a motion to quash. Rejected by the court. Judge in declining the motion rather than declaring default, invites defence to file a revised legal submission. Probably to give him ability to throw the case out in a way...

Well Crummy, you obviously get ignorant. Who would've guessed. There is no default if grounds given for default are not valid. Do you get that? Do you get this ..... "this Court considered that President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Arkeny, he...