Search results

  1. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    PT Let me know when you have conclusive proof, that I do not have conclusive proof there is no God. Until then I'll just consider your opinion has nothing to say. Many thanks.
  2. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    ...and are obviously very very angry about. Here is what you lie about.... It appears all you can do as a believer, ignoramus liar and troll, is alter my words and repeatedly lie about them. Apparently your beliefs rather perversely assist you in doing that. It might be looked on...
  3. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    As predicted. Infantile name calling, no substance, no argument. You only ever troll the false assertion I was wrong. You can't, won't, don't know how to show or explain yourself on how I am supposed to be wrong, despite the many explanations for why you are wrong. Same old false...
  4. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    There is obviously a severe need, anger and desperation in theists who will stoop to adopt any despicable effort to force a make believe God into the realms of science where it can't possibly fit or belong. Why the hell anyone would even want to sound so mindless to the point of perverting...
  5. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    Lol..... and someone suggested it was atheists who were angry :D Well done. You are already utterly without credibility and you do even worse. When it comes down to the line, and you're exposed red-handed for nothing more than posting an outright lie, you can only manage to follow up...
  6. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    Oh come on. You've never been able to rationally follow through on any line of reasoning, but like Jem you can make plenty of false claims. If you or Jem said it was a red paint dip, it would certainly turn out to be a green one. Penrose's so called "well known calculation" IS apparently so...
  7. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    You’ve been caught telling a lie and not for the first time. I didn't say what you claim and I couldn't mean anything other than what I said. Now you're just disgracing yourself further. Acting dishonesty and angry obscenity are clearly your specialized subjects.
  8. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    Quite frankly , it's taken a lot less than 150 of yours to see how you've nothing to say. You think maybe "waa waa there is a God" because Jem has 9983 posts trying to pretend there is.
  9. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    If you're not being stupid what are you being but insane ? When has "can" ever meant "proof", you idiot. Here is some science. The 1993 Bartel/Szostak experiment demonstrates that evolution works at the fundamental molecular level and unambiguously refutes the idea that the origin of...
  10. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    You did no such thing. What on earth is wrong with you? Free Thinker thinks you not stupid, yet you are invariably abusive insulting and constantly perverting the truth. That's seems pretty stupid enough.
  11. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    geeze no kidding. A measure of thinking required to defend belief in an imaginary deity so abysmally inadequate, it can only suppose to require proof for everything but the deity.
  12. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    There's been no claim by anyone there was proof that life evolved from non life. What has been said is all real indications point towards it can. You've clearly become so convinced by your own messed up religious irrationality in trying to support some freaky theistic bullshit, by altering...
  13. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    Ok, but you still needed that same science you call magic to log into ET so you can send another really f*kn dumb rambling post with a silly picture attached -at the speed of light.
  14. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    If "studies" are the best reason there is, there's no reason at all.
  15. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    The only reason you know of black holes is because of science. The only thing that proved Hawking wrong was science. The theists view is to childishly conclude an imaginary God. The atheists view is there is no need for, or reason to, childishly conclude an imaginary God . That much...
  16. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    Dream on Jem. Being wrong is what your nonsense relies on.
  17. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    Yes Jem, you do sound desperate and like a joke, but then you always did. You asked how you were taking those vids out of context. After it is explained, what do you do but ignore everything to mornically take another of your stock out of context edited clippings, and wrap your rather...
  18. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    Explain again!? Why? The context is totally obvious when you don't misinterpret, snatch lines and soundbites out of them as you do to bend around your weired religious ideas. It starts with both Dawkins and Penrose being self-proclaimed atheists. Dawkins is the last person to suggest...
  19. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    Jem stop being a troll and deal with the science. Our Universe appears to be fine tuned in the same way the Earth appears to be flat. Deal with it with some intellectual rigor instead of your petty et theist troll b.s.
  20. S

    Disproving atheists in 82 seconds

    twofacedjoker. 'nuf said.
Back
Top