Search results

what point? what's your point? i don't want to hear your crazy backazz woods butt-f^ck idea i want to hear smthg intelligible :D

the universe. god created the universe.. you don't see the extra step BACKWARD? :confused: at the very LEAST, you must explain your "rational" need to step back, for the extra "level" :confused:

\ and out of nothing God was created? by whom? Zeus? :confused:

your team been succking hind tit for a long LONG time your admission that you suck is not a discovery.. simply a FACT :p

elephants leave tracks. nuff said :eek:

they may not denigrate science, they disregard it. what are you waiting on :D how can ANY evidence refute omnipotence?

ANY theiset.. how can you negate omnipotence? is there ANY observation/fact/evidence/proof? if NOTHING could possibly present itself as refutation to an idea then how can you any rational being accept it :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

lets get serious.. how do you negate the possibility of omnipotence? what fact could disprove it? what observance can you give to prove omnipotence? :confused:

The 7 foods experts won't eat Corn-Fed Beef! :eek: http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/health/the-7-foods-experts-wont-eat-547963/ feed em corn or grass, still FATTY BEEF! JUST SAY NO :D

stewart is a genius, much more he's a decent guy that cares about people and humanity. HE CARES! :cool:

wow, that's beautiful surf! :eek:

you are a steeler fan. you got sh^t for brains :D

how can you tell santa claus from woods.. santa stopped at three HO HO HO's :D

No facts exist that believers have it right.. according to you i quote: "Believers will admit that their belief is based on faith" You just admitted to no facts for your position. (oh, ps i hope this isn't the way you approach your trading :p so, if any facts shall arise to support...

believers are factless, therefore they believe? they believe because their facts are less(factless) therefore they believe :D

these threads are all about examining the EVIDENCE. if opinion777 wishes to call this "judging" then so be it. judging the evidence. ps "political satire" in the form of cute pics, while it may work in politics is not evidence of scientific creation. :D who here wishes not to be judged by...

let's take a different tack. let me ask you a question.. are the witch burnings of the dark ages equivalent (to your mind) to the criminal trials of today? :D do you see any difference between blind ignorance and belief, and evidence/proof?

holy sh^t, we got three god threads going on simultaneously. please, someone start a another! LOL :p

you do realize YOU believe in an omnipotent benevolent man in the sky that tests his "universal" creation on a regular basis for humanly reverence and compliance because of what.. a giant omnipotent EGO?? :D stu.. believes in the universe. who is silly? LOL :D

i wouldn't gloat too much.. after all you are a brownie fan what are they 2-11 even a blind pig finds an acorn :D