Search results

it should have said "to which I linked"

1. your journal and the journal to which I liked were not the same. So if you were not joking you were mistaken. 2. on what basis do you compare Science and Education which has been publishing since 1992 with the predatory pay to publish journal from India you cited here in the past. do you...

and Trump is not governing like a conservative he is governing like mitch mcconnell. Those shits have tried to not repeal obamacare and now my monthly bill for a 10,000 deductible as gone from 4hundred something to 1291 dollars a month. my rate just went up significantly from last year. I just...

you move was right out of the troll playbook page 9. when your b.s. arguments are proven to be bullshit...try to make a joke and change the subject. it was actually cook's (your author) counter response (which last time I had checked) was rejected by peer reviewed journals.

that paper from cook is destroyed by this peer reviewed paper... the "consensus" for agw in the papers was under 1%. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-013-9647-9 Agnotology is the study of how ignorance arises via circulation of misinformation calculated to mislead. Legates et...

the other studies have been debunked as well. cook study was debunked in a peer reviewed paper. oreskes studies are easily debunked when you recognize she left out hundreds of skeptical peer reviewed papers.

1. but that is not responsive to question of why you stated this was one of the questions... if you are a climate scientist AND you have worked in the field by publishing a paper, what is your view on climate change." 2. approximately 5 percent of 3146 respondents would be 157. so 8.5 percent...

those guys in congress.... are mostly establishment republicans.... few are really conservatives

by the way... once again it seems you just pulled shit out of your ass an pretended your idea was reality. from what I read please document how you know there was a question framed like this... "if you are a climate scientist AND you have worked in the field by publishing a paper, what is...

you have no idea if there were 20, 200 or 2000 climate scientists who were skeptical were excluded. hence that study does not stand for a 97 percent of climate scientists it stands for 97 percent of a cherry picked group. and I note... that the consensus is not that man made co2 cause warming...

and how many climate scientists were excluded from that group of 77 or 79 but had answered the survey? and how many of those publications were true believer journals. its a very relevant set of questions which must be answered if you are going to cherry pick a subset of a survey of 10,000.

no... you have misrepresented the subset and how the subset was filtered or "cherry picked".

You seem to be the first lefties on this site who recognize that taking a cherry picked subset of a poll is does not result in a honest headline. Nice work. now lets examine the origins of the famed 97 percent consensus. a web based 10,000 surveys sent out to earth scientists 3,146 answers...

poor guy is going to get shipped out by some democrats before they do I suggest he run for president. no one will ask for his proof of citizenship.

only in the ignorant world of dnc fake news and logic would a person argue that a quote can't be out of context if you provide a full quote. its amazing how often you double down on stupidity rather than just cutting bait or admitting you got it wrong. All you had to say was sorry your 2nd...

if assange had not released hillarys emails showing her team to be crooked you all would be calling assange a hero.

Hillary did break the law with respect to her handling of classified info. (whether she is locked up is not the issue) And it sure looks like the deep state was "wiretapping" trump or his team and and there still is a strong possibility Obama knew.

did the people making fun of Trump and his family attempt to take the high ground when others made fun of Obama or Michelle?

http://thehill.com/opinion/finance/368904-economists-agree-trump-not-obama-gets-credit-for-economy The Wall Street Journal asked 68 business, financial and academic economists who was responsible for the strengthening of the economy, and most “suggested Mr. Trump’s election deserves at least...

I note that Congressman Dave Brat stated that if the economy grows at 2.7 percent this year the tax cuts will have paid for themselves. Off course this new spending bill makes determining if the tax cuts paid for themselves with growth very difficult to determine... once again.