Search results

Is it surprising when lefties believe in Grubering?

did you all notice... the fake consensus is a cherry picked 95 out of 10000 scientist who were sent the questionnaire. and that even the fake consensus does not address man made co2. the fake consensus is that man (not man made co2) contributes to warming.

http://ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/myths/31000-scientists-say-no-convincing-evidence plus this is for wikipedia.. Scientists questioning the accuracy of IPCC climate projections These scientists have said that it is not possible to project global climate accurately...

pretty funny... not single peer reviewed paper states man made co2 causes warming exists... unless it deals with failed models. and very few scientists state man made co2 causes warming. whereas there are thousands of skeptics.... yet we have whack job lefties claiming the opposite. I...

https://www.iceagenow.info/2013-ten-coldest-years-history/ “Before NASA and NOAA start tampering with the data, 2013 is one of the ten coldest years in the US since 1895,” says Steven Goddard website. “The largest year over year (temperature) decline on record. “NOAA of course won’t talk about...

do we really know anything is outside natural variation...

1. do we know that snowcover is not in a natural cycle? 2. is the lack of snow due a relative drought like the one in California, if so its very likely caused by drier cooler temperatures. 3. Do we really know that temps in the US are warmer...

I am sitting in my home office doing my mcles. (mandatory continuing ed) I am forced to endure diversity training about employees even though I only have subcontractors in my business. The presenters tried to prep us for their propaganda by making us think we don't perceive reality well...

here are the first 2 pages of 12 where I showed ET mentally crippled leftist trolls that their 97 percent were wrong because they were not able to model clouds... 100-reasons-why-climate-change-natural-and-not-manmade ...causing them to condense into airborne droplets, or aerosols. Clouds...

We told you nutters that climate models were not projecting temperature well because they were not getting clouds correct. and I note... the ubiquitous please don't take are study to say that agw models are invalid... even though we just told you why they have been wrong...

links where I explained the above... when doing a search there are 12 pages where I explained to frequently foul mouthed triggered leftist trolls that the models have been wrong because they don't model clouds properly.... here are the first 2 pages of 12 which show up when you search jem as...

We told you nutters that climate models were not projecting temperature well because they were not getting clouds correct. and I note... the ubiquitous please don't take are study to say that agw models are invalid... even though we just told you why they have been wrong...

also don't be fooled by FC charts and his confidence bands..Most of the times the bands he shows were just bands arbitrarily made up by an agw nutter. They were made to look like statistically created bands or even bollinger bands... but they are not based on stats.... other times he showing...

please note... global warming nut cases are only going to be focused on very recently instrument data... which is continuously being adjusted to show more recent warming. So when you see leftist hysteria understand that they are acting like the last 100 years or of of instrument data... is...

nice article from the times. it was put out there to get the democrat message leaders and candidates to realize that if they wish to pick up some seats they going to have to show independents they are not deranged. or that they should be running as non establishment democrats. TDS works for the...

I thought the name was a tip off. Richter being an honest self admitted marxist at heart would admit he did not trade and took heat for doing so. So he picked a named which would convey the opposite.

rewrite... Under the 4th amendment a person carrying a message you wrote would not be required to let the govt read the message nor would the person carrying the message be forced to divulge you location. (Absent exceptions such as probable cause or a warrant.) Also, as I explained earlier...

I was not talking about attorney work product. That would be a different analysis. Take any other business. Lets say an advertising agency. You put your valuable work product in a sack and expect it to be delivered. Your right of privacy is protected. Police can't just force you to open the...

If I contract with a person to deliver package from me to you.... That person is my agent. Law offices do this all the time with confidential communications. I was younger in large cities law firms had runners. If the govt said open that package the person would have to claim the privacy...