Search results

you just made my point. the location of the vote matters when you look at races state by state... not the raw vote totals. do you realize how set up you were because you don't see systems. It was as if you gave me the exact answers I was expecting from you. Welcome to your first systematic...

you are incapable of thinking in systems. if the majority of the raw votes were the key factor... how the hell did democrats not regain the Senate. how many different ways do you have to learn that our system for electing officials is not based on raw vote totals but where those votes occur...

your analysis and your posts lack any sort of intellectual rigor or honesty. you are paid 35 cents a post... because that is what you are worth.

He is the first democrat who has said anything real and intelligent in the last 4 years. He just put every tard as you call them on this board to shame. He was particularly insightful about warren. Had she not chased around bernies leftist tail and established "exoctic" positions... she would...

and democrat turn out in Iowa was terrible. and you tell us few blacks will vote for pete. and now Van Jones even tells us the Trump could receive a meaningful percentage of the black votes. your obviously weak arguments have been exposed as worthless by the new voting season.

he has been on radio for 3 decades I would imagine you could present us a long list of hate mongering. He may argue against sick ideologies but he never hated types of people when I was listening... I think he america and its individuals of all types. As do most conservatives.

Van Jones is smart enough to get things correct at times. (When it fits in with the views he is pushing.) Its seems to me Trump is starting to get more black people on board. You can talk about Trump with black people and they don't react like crazy white leftists. Really the conversations I...

when you compare him to Goebbels, reveals you to be the crazy. Ironically that was one of Limbaugh's most entertaining routines. He would reveal how crazy those who call themselves moderates really are by using their own words and deeds against them.

Far too many commercials just like the NFL; so I ceased listening to him like I ceased watching the NFL... a few years ago. but when I did listen to him in my car... I was amazed by how entertaining his delivery was. (I am not addressing his content) He is by far the most entertaining...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actual_malice In this case... proving actual malice should not be a challenge. Hillary was obviously trying to damage Gabbard's campaign when she created that lie. Hillary is probably going to need to have steele create a dossier.

In that case the lawsuit is almost compulsory. Retraction and cash or verdict may be the only endgame.

In your opinion what amount would be appropriate for a complaint and what amount would be just compensation? Calling a politician who served in the military a Russian asset is pretty damn defamatory in my view. Look what happened to Trump when the Clinton machine decided to call him a...

The Fed? You told us for years the Fed Did not create money out of thin air. Now we see they have created 6 trillion on the way to 9 trillion without any act of Congress over the last few months. is that a conspiracy theory too? Only a paid propagandist 100 accustomed to lying could pretend...

I thought it was already clear. He offered a quid pro quo for a meeting - Mulvaney told us so. He probably had Guiliani offer a quid pro quo for the funding because he was seeking a corruption investigation which could have also benefited him personally as a politician. He may have even told...

by the way... you all see the kabuki going on? after weeks of acting like McConnell had "Darth Vader like control" (from the dem perspective) Surprise... today he tells us he doesn't have the votes. Schumer and Pelosi will get what they want all along. So now... I wonder if they will even get...

Never have I ever interacted with a person as smart as you are are - who so consistently arrives at an incorrect conclusion or makes a prediction which fails. (save science). Your track record on this board is amazingly close to zero percent correct on any issues you spend any time...

do you know who glenn greenwald is? you should come up to speed before you cast asperisions. ... https://theintercept.com/2017/01/11/the-deep-state-goes-to-war-with-president-elect-using-unverified-claims-as-dems-cheer/ Glenn Greenwald January 11 2017, 6:35 a.m. IN JANUARY 1961, Dwight...

yeah because it was conservatives in the streets celebrating when OJ was found not guilty. and dershowitz is not a political conservative.

correction the last guy to gotcha his opponent was Clinton... through the Obama administration the deep state and the fisa court.

this is the entire problem in a nut shell. lefties assert this as if it fact and law. I have a friend who studied physics and engineering in college... (not his degree but a smart guy...) making this argument a few days ago. He is so wound up... he could not even think that perhaps it does...